The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery

Aims. To compare the efficacy and safety of semiautonomous Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and fully automated (closed-loop, Intellivent-ASV) mechanical ventilation and oxygenation versus conventional mechanical ventilation mode during respiratory support in cardiac surgery patients.Material and me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. A. Yeremenko, R. D. Komnov, E. A. Koshek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia 2022-06-01
Series:Общая реаниматология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.reanimatology.com/rmt/article/view/2236
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849410327080337408
author A. A. Yeremenko
R. D. Komnov
E. A. Koshek
author_facet A. A. Yeremenko
R. D. Komnov
E. A. Koshek
author_sort A. A. Yeremenko
collection DOAJ
description Aims. To compare the efficacy and safety of semiautonomous Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and fully automated (closed-loop, Intellivent-ASV) mechanical ventilation and oxygenation versus conventional mechanical ventilation mode during respiratory support in cardiac surgery patients.Material and methods. In this study, 40 adult patients were ventilated by conventional mechanical ventilation managed by 8 physicians (control group), whereas other two groups patients were ventilated by Intellivent-ASV (n=40) or in a semiautomatic ASV mode (n=40). The groups received standard care, except for the modes of ventilation.Results. In the Intellivent-ASV group, the number of manual changes in ventilator settings was significantly lower: 0 (0–0) versus 2 (2–3) (ASV) and 4 (3–5) in the control group (P<0.0001). There were significant differences in the duration of respiratory support in ICU which was 226±31 min (Intellivent group) vs 259±66 (ASV) and 271±78 min (control) (P=0.0042; P1–2=0.0167; P1–3=0.009). The Intellivent-ASV group patients received more protective ventilation than patients in the semiautomated and physician-controlled groups (lower values of driving pressure (6 (6–7) cm H2O vs. 6 (6–7) and 7 (7–9) cm H2O (P<0.0001)), tidal volume (6 (6–7) vs. 7 (7–7.7) and 7 (7–8) ml/kg/PBW (P<0.0001)), FiO2 (26 (24–30)% vs. 34 (30–35)% and 34 (30–38)%) with no differences between the groups in paO2/FiO2. There were no significant differences between the groups in frequency of undesirable events and duration of ICU stay.Conclusion. The use of intelligent technologies makes it possible to interactively individualize respiratory support, significantly reducing clinician's involvement in this process without compromising patient safety and the quality of ventilation.
format Article
id doaj-art-f11d2da7f0d04dbf8e98f48c78bc4630
institution Kabale University
issn 1813-9779
2411-7110
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia
record_format Article
series Общая реаниматология
spelling doaj-art-f11d2da7f0d04dbf8e98f48c78bc46302025-08-20T03:35:08ZengFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, RussiaОбщая реаниматология1813-97792411-71102022-06-01183212910.15360/1813-9779-2022-3-21-291849The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac SurgeryA. A. Yeremenko0R. D. Komnov1E. A. Koshek2B.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for SurgeryB.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for SurgeryB.V. Petrovsky Russian Research Center for SurgeryAims. To compare the efficacy and safety of semiautonomous Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and fully automated (closed-loop, Intellivent-ASV) mechanical ventilation and oxygenation versus conventional mechanical ventilation mode during respiratory support in cardiac surgery patients.Material and methods. In this study, 40 adult patients were ventilated by conventional mechanical ventilation managed by 8 physicians (control group), whereas other two groups patients were ventilated by Intellivent-ASV (n=40) or in a semiautomatic ASV mode (n=40). The groups received standard care, except for the modes of ventilation.Results. In the Intellivent-ASV group, the number of manual changes in ventilator settings was significantly lower: 0 (0–0) versus 2 (2–3) (ASV) and 4 (3–5) in the control group (P<0.0001). There were significant differences in the duration of respiratory support in ICU which was 226±31 min (Intellivent group) vs 259±66 (ASV) and 271±78 min (control) (P=0.0042; P1–2=0.0167; P1–3=0.009). The Intellivent-ASV group patients received more protective ventilation than patients in the semiautomated and physician-controlled groups (lower values of driving pressure (6 (6–7) cm H2O vs. 6 (6–7) and 7 (7–9) cm H2O (P<0.0001)), tidal volume (6 (6–7) vs. 7 (7–7.7) and 7 (7–8) ml/kg/PBW (P<0.0001)), FiO2 (26 (24–30)% vs. 34 (30–35)% and 34 (30–38)%) with no differences between the groups in paO2/FiO2. There were no significant differences between the groups in frequency of undesirable events and duration of ICU stay.Conclusion. The use of intelligent technologies makes it possible to interactively individualize respiratory support, significantly reducing clinician's involvement in this process without compromising patient safety and the quality of ventilation.https://www.reanimatology.com/rmt/article/view/2236automatic weaningintellivent-asvintellectual modes of ventilationasvcardiac surgeryintensive care
spellingShingle A. A. Yeremenko
R. D. Komnov
E. A. Koshek
The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery
Общая реаниматология
automatic weaning
intellivent-asv
intellectual modes of ventilation
asv
cardiac surgery
intensive care
title The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Modes During Respiratory Support After Cardiac Surgery
title_sort efficacy and safety of automatic modes during respiratory support after cardiac surgery
topic automatic weaning
intellivent-asv
intellectual modes of ventilation
asv
cardiac surgery
intensive care
url https://www.reanimatology.com/rmt/article/view/2236
work_keys_str_mv AT aayeremenko theefficacyandsafetyofautomaticmodesduringrespiratorysupportaftercardiacsurgery
AT rdkomnov theefficacyandsafetyofautomaticmodesduringrespiratorysupportaftercardiacsurgery
AT eakoshek theefficacyandsafetyofautomaticmodesduringrespiratorysupportaftercardiacsurgery
AT aayeremenko efficacyandsafetyofautomaticmodesduringrespiratorysupportaftercardiacsurgery
AT rdkomnov efficacyandsafetyofautomaticmodesduringrespiratorysupportaftercardiacsurgery
AT eakoshek efficacyandsafetyofautomaticmodesduringrespiratorysupportaftercardiacsurgery