Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law
Freedom of information acts (FOIA) aim to improve the public’s opportunities to access official information from public authorities and hence to increase the level of transparency. Thus, it is important to know whether and to what degree the effects intended by establishing FOIAs are achieved and h...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
2018-11-01
|
| Series: | Central European Public Administration Review |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20499 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832591556395139072 |
|---|---|
| author | Christoph E. Mueller Bettina Engewald |
| author_facet | Christoph E. Mueller Bettina Engewald |
| author_sort | Christoph E. Mueller |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Freedom of information acts (FOIA) aim to improve the public’s opportunities to access official information from public authorities and hence to increase the level of transparency. Thus, it is important to know whether and to what degree the effects intended by establishing FOIAs are achieved and how their implementation could be improved. Hence, this article presents the evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law (HmbTG)– Germany’s first FOIA that binds authorities to disclose government information proactively. The purpose of the paper is to provide a valuable example of how evaluating FOIA might produce useful information for policymakers and public authorities. The analysis results, based on a mixed set of methods (i.e. standardised surveys, statistical secondary data, qualitative expert interviews, and criteria-driven document analysis), lead to the conclusion that the HmbTG was very effective in providing the direct access. On the other hand, it was found that strategies for implementing the law varied considerably between authorities, yet proactive disclosure was overall implemented effectively. Moreover, this law shows some weaknesses to be improved in the future. Besides providing practitioners with valuable insights into how a transparency law may be implemented, the evaluation of the HmbTG also provides researchers with ideas how FOIA evaluation might be conducted comprehensively.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f115ed81ee694f39be6f93c7bd8f8150 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2591-2240 2591-2259 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
| publisher | University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Central European Public Administration Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-f115ed81ee694f39be6f93c7bd8f81502025-01-22T10:51:43ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Central European Public Administration Review2591-22402591-22592018-11-0116210.17573/cepar.2018.2.04Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency LawChristoph E. Mueller0Bettina Engewald1German Research Institute for Public AdministrationGerman Research Institute for Public Administration Freedom of information acts (FOIA) aim to improve the public’s opportunities to access official information from public authorities and hence to increase the level of transparency. Thus, it is important to know whether and to what degree the effects intended by establishing FOIAs are achieved and how their implementation could be improved. Hence, this article presents the evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law (HmbTG)– Germany’s first FOIA that binds authorities to disclose government information proactively. The purpose of the paper is to provide a valuable example of how evaluating FOIA might produce useful information for policymakers and public authorities. The analysis results, based on a mixed set of methods (i.e. standardised surveys, statistical secondary data, qualitative expert interviews, and criteria-driven document analysis), lead to the conclusion that the HmbTG was very effective in providing the direct access. On the other hand, it was found that strategies for implementing the law varied considerably between authorities, yet proactive disclosure was overall implemented effectively. Moreover, this law shows some weaknesses to be improved in the future. Besides providing practitioners with valuable insights into how a transparency law may be implemented, the evaluation of the HmbTG also provides researchers with ideas how FOIA evaluation might be conducted comprehensively. https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20499 |
| spellingShingle | Christoph E. Mueller Bettina Engewald Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law Central European Public Administration Review |
| title | Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law |
| title_full | Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law |
| title_fullStr | Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law |
| title_short | Making Transparency Work: Experiences from the Evaluation of the Hamburg Transparency Law |
| title_sort | making transparency work experiences from the evaluation of the hamburg transparency law |
| url | https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20499 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christophemueller makingtransparencyworkexperiencesfromtheevaluationofthehamburgtransparencylaw AT bettinaengewald makingtransparencyworkexperiencesfromtheevaluationofthehamburgtransparencylaw |