Comparitive advertising

At a meeting of the Association of Advertising Agencies In 1989, members voted against comparative advertising, but the mere fact that the AAA found the Issue Important enough to bring to a ballot and because the outcome was so close, proves just how relevant and Immediate this issue is. This explo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vanessa Bloom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Johannesburg 2022-11-01
Series:Communicare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/2042
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593898885611520
author Vanessa Bloom
author_facet Vanessa Bloom
author_sort Vanessa Bloom
collection DOAJ
description At a meeting of the Association of Advertising Agencies In 1989, members voted against comparative advertising, but the mere fact that the AAA found the Issue Important enough to bring to a ballot and because the outcome was so close, proves just how relevant and Immediate this issue is. This exploratory Informal article aims to "stir the pot" and generate debate on this controversial practice. The lack of unanimity amongst practitioners in the Industry and the findings of the Informal pilot study point to a need for substan tial consumer research, something which to date has been sorely neglected. This article does not profess to do anything more than suggest hypotheses for study, but is does prove that the Issue of comparative advertising should not be "swept under the carpet" by a conspiracy of reluctance to "upset the apple-cart", but should be looked at honestly, from both the Industry's and the consumers' point of view.
format Article
id doaj-art-f0329c45fdd04635bae88deabf8c6eae
institution Kabale University
issn 0259-0069
2957-7950
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher University of Johannesburg
record_format Article
series Communicare
spelling doaj-art-f0329c45fdd04635bae88deabf8c6eae2025-01-20T08:44:58ZengUniversity of JohannesburgCommunicare0259-00692957-79502022-11-019110.36615/jcsa.v9i1.2042Comparitive advertisingVanessa Bloom0University of Johannesburg At a meeting of the Association of Advertising Agencies In 1989, members voted against comparative advertising, but the mere fact that the AAA found the Issue Important enough to bring to a ballot and because the outcome was so close, proves just how relevant and Immediate this issue is. This exploratory Informal article aims to "stir the pot" and generate debate on this controversial practice. The lack of unanimity amongst practitioners in the Industry and the findings of the Informal pilot study point to a need for substan tial consumer research, something which to date has been sorely neglected. This article does not profess to do anything more than suggest hypotheses for study, but is does prove that the Issue of comparative advertising should not be "swept under the carpet" by a conspiracy of reluctance to "upset the apple-cart", but should be looked at honestly, from both the Industry's and the consumers' point of view. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/2042Association of Advertising Agenciescomparative advertisingcontroversial practiceInformal pilot studyconsumer research
spellingShingle Vanessa Bloom
Comparitive advertising
Communicare
Association of Advertising Agencies
comparative advertising
controversial practice
Informal pilot study
consumer research
title Comparitive advertising
title_full Comparitive advertising
title_fullStr Comparitive advertising
title_full_unstemmed Comparitive advertising
title_short Comparitive advertising
title_sort comparitive advertising
topic Association of Advertising Agencies
comparative advertising
controversial practice
Informal pilot study
consumer research
url https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/2042
work_keys_str_mv AT vanessabloom comparitiveadvertising