Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
Participants in the Ultimatum Game will often reject unfair resource allocations at personal cost, reflecting a trade-off between financial gain and maintenance of social standing. Although this rejection behavior is linked to executive control, the exact role of cognitive regulation in relation to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Alison Harris, Aleena Young, Livia Hughson, Danielle Green, Stacey N Doan, Eric Hughson, Catherine L Reed |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227717&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Fairness in the multi-proposer-multi-responder ultimatum game.
by: Hana Krakovská, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The Dynamics of the Discrete Ultimatum Game and the Role of the Expectation Level
by: Lili Deng, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Age, but not education, affects social decision-making in the ultimatum game paradigm
by: Luciana Cassimiro, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
Detailed analysis of drift diffusion model parameters estimated for the ultimatum game
by: Shotaro Numano, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
A Critique of Methodological Individualism: The Concept of Altruism and Application of the Ultimatum Game
by: Yıldız Zeliha Hatipoğlu
Published: (2021-09-01)