Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?

Before puzzling over some possible conjunction between literature and philosophy, one has to agree on what such concepts mean. However, as soon as one wonders about their definitions, concepts like “literature” or “the novel” on the one hand, or “philosophy” or even “concept” on the other, prove all...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ralph M. Berry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Française d'Etudes Américaines 2020-12-01
Series:Transatlantica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/15428
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832580794352140288
author Ralph M. Berry
author_facet Ralph M. Berry
author_sort Ralph M. Berry
collection DOAJ
description Before puzzling over some possible conjunction between literature and philosophy, one has to agree on what such concepts mean. However, as soon as one wonders about their definitions, concepts like “literature” or “the novel” on the one hand, or “philosophy” or even “concept” on the other, prove all too elusive. If one thinks they know what a novel is, it proves virtually impossible to freeze a suitable definition of the aesthetic concept. The reason for that impossibility might be that philosophy’s mission, to the extent that it reflects upon concepts, is somehow to blur them. Yet this article aims to show that it is precisely in that sense that literature, through the example of the novel, is in itself philosophical to the degree that what defines the novel is a self-reflexive interrogation of what makes it so. With the example of Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse, the article concludes that there might be no intrinsic knowledge of our (aesthetic) concepts outside examples.
format Article
id doaj-art-eec5225bd6ce42448fbf7d0ed1dda3dd
institution Kabale University
issn 1765-2766
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
record_format Article
series Transatlantica
spelling doaj-art-eec5225bd6ce42448fbf7d0ed1dda3dd2025-01-30T10:43:50ZengAssociation Française d'Etudes AméricainesTransatlantica1765-27662020-12-01110.4000/transatlantica.15428Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?Ralph M. BerryBefore puzzling over some possible conjunction between literature and philosophy, one has to agree on what such concepts mean. However, as soon as one wonders about their definitions, concepts like “literature” or “the novel” on the one hand, or “philosophy” or even “concept” on the other, prove all too elusive. If one thinks they know what a novel is, it proves virtually impossible to freeze a suitable definition of the aesthetic concept. The reason for that impossibility might be that philosophy’s mission, to the extent that it reflects upon concepts, is somehow to blur them. Yet this article aims to show that it is precisely in that sense that literature, through the example of the novel, is in itself philosophical to the degree that what defines the novel is a self-reflexive interrogation of what makes it so. With the example of Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse, the article concludes that there might be no intrinsic knowledge of our (aesthetic) concepts outside examples.https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/15428timephilosophyWittgensteinnovelconceptdefinition
spellingShingle Ralph M. Berry
Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?
Transatlantica
time
philosophy
Wittgenstein
novel
concept
definition
title Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?
title_full Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?
title_fullStr Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?
title_full_unstemmed Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?
title_short Can Literature Know Itself and Not Become Philosophy?
title_sort can literature know itself and not become philosophy
topic time
philosophy
Wittgenstein
novel
concept
definition
url https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/15428
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphmberry canliteratureknowitselfandnotbecomephilosophy