Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark
<p>The present paper proposes a comparison of three well-established controllers: a robust proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx13">Conord and Peaucelle</a>, <a href=&qu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Wind Energy Science |
| Online Access: | https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/10/177/2025/wes-10-177-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593509260984320 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Michel C. Braud J.-P. Barbot J.-P. Barbot F. Plestan D. Peaucelle X. Boucher |
| author_facet | L. Michel C. Braud J.-P. Barbot J.-P. Barbot F. Plestan D. Peaucelle X. Boucher |
| author_sort | L. Michel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The present paper proposes a comparison of three well-established controllers: a robust proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx13">Conord and Peaucelle</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx13">2021</a></span>), a model-free control (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx14">Fliess and Join</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx14">2013</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx15">2022</a></span>) and an adaptive sliding-mode control based on the super-twisting algorithm (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.3"><a href="#bib1.bibx37">Shtessel et al.</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx37">2023</a></span>). The benchmark considered is an airfoil section equipped with trailing edge jets, load sensors and a perturbation system. The objective is to track the lift command under external wind perturbations. The outcome of this work is the comparison of performances for three control laws that are suitable when little knowledge is known from the physics. This study quantifies performance not only in terms of load control, but also in the needed implementation effort.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eea94d2d74014f40a73336737a757d58 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2366-7443 2366-7451 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wind Energy Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-eea94d2d74014f40a73336737a757d582025-01-20T13:08:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsWind Energy Science2366-74432366-74512025-01-011017719110.5194/wes-10-177-2025Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmarkL. Michel0C. Braud1J.-P. Barbot2J.-P. Barbot3F. Plestan4D. Peaucelle5X. Boucher6Nantes Université, École Centrale de Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, 44000 Nantes, FranceNantes Université, École Centrale de Nantes, CNRS, LHEEA, UMR 6598, 44000 Nantes, FranceNantes Université, École Centrale de Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, 44000 Nantes, FranceENSEA, Quartz Laboratory, EA 7393, 95014 Cergy-Pontoise, FranceNantes Université, École Centrale de Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, 44000 Nantes, FranceLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, FranceUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières-LSSI, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3 Quebec, Canada<p>The present paper proposes a comparison of three well-established controllers: a robust proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx13">Conord and Peaucelle</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx13">2021</a></span>), a model-free control (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx14">Fliess and Join</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx14">2013</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx15">2022</a></span>) and an adaptive sliding-mode control based on the super-twisting algorithm (<span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.3"><a href="#bib1.bibx37">Shtessel et al.</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx37">2023</a></span>). The benchmark considered is an airfoil section equipped with trailing edge jets, load sensors and a perturbation system. The objective is to track the lift command under external wind perturbations. The outcome of this work is the comparison of performances for three control laws that are suitable when little knowledge is known from the physics. This study quantifies performance not only in terms of load control, but also in the needed implementation effort.</p>https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/10/177/2025/wes-10-177-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | L. Michel C. Braud J.-P. Barbot J.-P. Barbot F. Plestan D. Peaucelle X. Boucher Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark Wind Energy Science |
| title | Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark |
| title_full | Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark |
| title_short | Comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark |
| title_sort | comparison of different feedback controllers on an airfoil benchmark |
| url | https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/10/177/2025/wes-10-177-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lmichel comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark AT cbraud comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark AT jpbarbot comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark AT jpbarbot comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark AT fplestan comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark AT dpeaucelle comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark AT xboucher comparisonofdifferentfeedbackcontrollersonanairfoilbenchmark |