Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites
For comparison, the drilling behaviour of abaca fiber-reinforced polymer (AFRP) composites and Kevlar-reinforced epoxy polymer (KFRP) composites has been studied in the specified experimental condition. The different geometrical drilling tools have been used for the investigation, namely, candlestic...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9019334 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832561535066570752 |
---|---|
author | A. Mohan Kumar R. Rajasekar P. Manoj Kumar R. Parameshwaran Alagar Karthick M. Muhibbullah |
author_facet | A. Mohan Kumar R. Rajasekar P. Manoj Kumar R. Parameshwaran Alagar Karthick M. Muhibbullah |
author_sort | A. Mohan Kumar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | For comparison, the drilling behaviour of abaca fiber-reinforced polymer (AFRP) composites and Kevlar-reinforced epoxy polymer (KFRP) composites has been studied in the specified experimental condition. The different geometrical drilling tools have been used for the investigation, namely, candlestick (T1), core (T2), standard twist drill (T3), and step cone (T4). The tool feed of 30, 45, and 60 m/min and rotational speed of 1000, 1500, and 2000 rpm have been used for the investigation. The thrust force is chosen as a response parameter for this study. The results revealed that, at lesser rotational speed and tool feed, the thrust force has declined. The result obtained correlates with the abaca fiber-based systems. However, the thrust force of KFRP is higher compared to AFRP composite systems. The axial force generated by candlestick drill is minimal compared to the other drill bits. The following may be responsible for lower thrust force: (1) the axial force distributes circumferential of the cutting tool instead of focusing at the center and (2) the interfacial adhesiveness between the matrix and the fiber is higher. The optimization of drilling process parameters, namely, tool feed and rotational speed on thrust force, has been studied. The results reveal that the tool feed contributed more to axial force compared to rotational speed. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ed13a5a19e564a3bb54f58b2bfde5927 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8434 1687-8442 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
spelling | doaj-art-ed13a5a19e564a3bb54f58b2bfde59272025-02-03T01:24:50ZengWileyAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84341687-84422021-01-01202110.1155/2021/90193349019334Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based CompositesA. Mohan Kumar0R. Rajasekar1P. Manoj Kumar2R. Parameshwaran3Alagar Karthick4M. Muhibbullah5School of Building and Mechanical Sciences, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai 638060, Tamil Nadu, IndiaSchool of Building and Mechanical Sciences, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai 638060, Tamil Nadu, IndiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore 641407, Tamil Nadu, IndiaSchool of Building and Mechanical Sciences, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai 638060, Tamil Nadu, IndiaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore 641407, Tamil Nadu, IndiaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bangladesh University, Dhaka 1207, BangladeshFor comparison, the drilling behaviour of abaca fiber-reinforced polymer (AFRP) composites and Kevlar-reinforced epoxy polymer (KFRP) composites has been studied in the specified experimental condition. The different geometrical drilling tools have been used for the investigation, namely, candlestick (T1), core (T2), standard twist drill (T3), and step cone (T4). The tool feed of 30, 45, and 60 m/min and rotational speed of 1000, 1500, and 2000 rpm have been used for the investigation. The thrust force is chosen as a response parameter for this study. The results revealed that, at lesser rotational speed and tool feed, the thrust force has declined. The result obtained correlates with the abaca fiber-based systems. However, the thrust force of KFRP is higher compared to AFRP composite systems. The axial force generated by candlestick drill is minimal compared to the other drill bits. The following may be responsible for lower thrust force: (1) the axial force distributes circumferential of the cutting tool instead of focusing at the center and (2) the interfacial adhesiveness between the matrix and the fiber is higher. The optimization of drilling process parameters, namely, tool feed and rotational speed on thrust force, has been studied. The results reveal that the tool feed contributed more to axial force compared to rotational speed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9019334 |
spellingShingle | A. Mohan Kumar R. Rajasekar P. Manoj Kumar R. Parameshwaran Alagar Karthick M. Muhibbullah Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
title | Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Drilling Behaviour of Synthetic and Natural Fiber-Based Composites |
title_sort | comparative analysis of drilling behaviour of synthetic and natural fiber based composites |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9019334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amohankumar comparativeanalysisofdrillingbehaviourofsyntheticandnaturalfiberbasedcomposites AT rrajasekar comparativeanalysisofdrillingbehaviourofsyntheticandnaturalfiberbasedcomposites AT pmanojkumar comparativeanalysisofdrillingbehaviourofsyntheticandnaturalfiberbasedcomposites AT rparameshwaran comparativeanalysisofdrillingbehaviourofsyntheticandnaturalfiberbasedcomposites AT alagarkarthick comparativeanalysisofdrillingbehaviourofsyntheticandnaturalfiberbasedcomposites AT mmuhibbullah comparativeanalysisofdrillingbehaviourofsyntheticandnaturalfiberbasedcomposites |