Quantifying the impact of unmeasured confounding in observational studies with the E value
The E value method deals with unmeasured confounding, a key source of bias in observational studies. The E value method is described and its use is shown in a worked example of a meta-analysis examining the association between the use of antidepressants in pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Irene Petersen, Vera Ehrenstein, Henrik Støvring, Tobias Gaster, Christine Marie Eggertsen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000366.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A Bayesian approach to correct for unmeasured or semi-unmeasured confounding in survival data using multiple validation data sets
by: Wencong Chen, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Negative control-calibrated difference-in-difference analyses: addressing unmeasured confounding in RWD with application to racial/ethnic differences
by: Dazheng Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Flexible quantitative bias analysis for unmeasured confounding in subject-level indirect treatment comparisons with proportional hazards violation
by: Steven Soutar, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
How likely is unmeasured confounding to explain meta-analysis-derived associations between alcohol, other substances, and mood-related conditions with HIV risk behaviors?
by: Prima Manandhar-Sasaki, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
A Patient With Unmeasurable Urine Creatinine
by: Max J.M. Silvis, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01)