Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature
The essay examines the problem of identity in its implicit relation to the memory of the past on the material of post-Soviet literature. The question of identity or “how to think identity” is and has always been relevant for every national literature. Arguing with interpretation of identity as count...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Studia Litterarum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://old.studlit.ru/articles/Sultanov.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850227696155492352 |
|---|---|
| author | Kazbek K. Sultanov |
| author_facet | Kazbek K. Sultanov |
| author_sort | Kazbek K. Sultanov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The essay examines the problem of identity in its implicit relation to the memory of the past on the material of post-Soviet literature. The question of identity or “how to think identity” is and has always been relevant for every national literature. Arguing with interpretation of identity as counterpart of nostalgic traditionalism, the author stresses not only the importance of ethno-cultural context, but also the importance of constants of non-ethnic origin such as openness, dynamism, progressiveness, and mutual permeability of cultures in the process of self-identification. The role of the “still persisting past” as part of this process has been so significant in a number of literary works that one can speak of a specific temporal mode of the way historical memory functions. A reminiscing man/woman has become a favorite image in the literatures of the peoples of Russia. The paradigm of historical memory bears on key symbols and stock conventional characters but often itself becomes the catalyst for retrospective maximalism, idealization of the past, and tautology of meaning directed towards potential inexhaustibility of traumatic experience. However, identity as well as understanding of the past cannot be reduced to such intensity and self-sufficiency of historical remembering, when the recurrence of trauma displaces projective thinking about the future and inevitability of change. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ec3d0d640ddd42fd956cd8d4e31a9c4e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2500-4247 2541-8564 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Litterarum |
| spelling | doaj-art-ec3d0d640ddd42fd956cd8d4e31a9c4e2025-08-20T02:04:44ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World LiteratureStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642016-09-0111-230232110.22455/2500-4247-2016-1-1-2-302-321Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet LiteratureKazbek K. Sultanov0A. M. Gorky Institute of the World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe essay examines the problem of identity in its implicit relation to the memory of the past on the material of post-Soviet literature. The question of identity or “how to think identity” is and has always been relevant for every national literature. Arguing with interpretation of identity as counterpart of nostalgic traditionalism, the author stresses not only the importance of ethno-cultural context, but also the importance of constants of non-ethnic origin such as openness, dynamism, progressiveness, and mutual permeability of cultures in the process of self-identification. The role of the “still persisting past” as part of this process has been so significant in a number of literary works that one can speak of a specific temporal mode of the way historical memory functions. A reminiscing man/woman has become a favorite image in the literatures of the peoples of Russia. The paradigm of historical memory bears on key symbols and stock conventional characters but often itself becomes the catalyst for retrospective maximalism, idealization of the past, and tautology of meaning directed towards potential inexhaustibility of traumatic experience. However, identity as well as understanding of the past cannot be reduced to such intensity and self-sufficiency of historical remembering, when the recurrence of trauma displaces projective thinking about the future and inevitability of change.http://old.studlit.ru/articles/Sultanov.pdfidentityhistorical memoryhistorical narrativereconstructiontemporalityneo-archaizationdemythologizationtraumatic experienceretrospective maximalismsymbolic representation |
| spellingShingle | Kazbek K. Sultanov Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature Studia Litterarum identity historical memory historical narrative reconstruction temporality neo-archaization demythologization traumatic experience retrospective maximalism symbolic representation |
| title | Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature |
| title_full | Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature |
| title_fullStr | Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature |
| title_full_unstemmed | Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature |
| title_short | Representation of the Past as the Major Factor of Self-Identity in Post-Soviet Literature |
| title_sort | representation of the past as the major factor of self identity in post soviet literature |
| topic | identity historical memory historical narrative reconstruction temporality neo-archaization demythologization traumatic experience retrospective maximalism symbolic representation |
| url | http://old.studlit.ru/articles/Sultanov.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kazbekksultanov representationofthepastasthemajorfactorofselfidentityinpostsovietliterature |