General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands

Objectives To investigate how many general practitioner (GP)-referred venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are diagnosed during 1 year in one geographical region and to investigate the (urgent) referral pathway of VTE diagnoses, including the role of laboratory D-dimer testing.Design Historical cohor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angel M R Schols, Eline Meijs, Geert-Jan Dinant, Henri E J H Stoffers, Mariëlle M E Krekels, Jochen W L Cals
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/5/e026846.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574333535387648
author Angel M R Schols
Eline Meijs
Geert-Jan Dinant
Henri E J H Stoffers
Mariëlle M E Krekels
Jochen W L Cals
author_facet Angel M R Schols
Eline Meijs
Geert-Jan Dinant
Henri E J H Stoffers
Mariëlle M E Krekels
Jochen W L Cals
author_sort Angel M R Schols
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To investigate how many general practitioner (GP)-referred venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are diagnosed during 1 year in one geographical region and to investigate the (urgent) referral pathway of VTE diagnoses, including the role of laboratory D-dimer testing.Design Historical cohort study.Setting GP patients of 47 general practices in a demarcated geographical region of 161 503 inhabitants in the Netherlands.Participants We analysed all 895 primary care patients in whom either the GP determined a D-dimer value or who had a diagnostic work-up for suspected VTE in a non-academic hospital during 2015.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcomes of this study were the total number of VTEs per year and the diagnostic pathways—including the role of GP determined D-dimer testing—of patients urgently referred to secondary care for suspected VTE. Additionally, we explored the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off.Results The annual VTE incidence was 0.9 per 1000 inhabitants. GPs annually ordered 5.1 D-dimer tests per 1000 inhabitants. Of 470 urgently GP-referred patients, 31.3% had a VTE. Of those urgently referred based on clinical assessment only (without D-dimer testing), 73.8% (96/130) had a VTE; based on clinical assessment and laboratory D-dimer testing yielded 15.0% (51/340) VTE. Applying age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs to all patients aged 50 years or older resulted in a reduction of positive D-dimer results from 97.9% to 79.4%, without missing any VTE.Conclusions Although D-dimer testing contributes to the diagnostic work-up of VTE, GPs have a high detection rate for VTE in patients who they urgently refer to secondary care based on clinical assessment only.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec0e3b9b784a4b94ab82b490fe34e2e5
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-ec0e3b9b784a4b94ab82b490fe34e2e52025-02-01T20:05:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-05-019510.1136/bmjopen-2018-026846General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the NetherlandsAngel M R Schols0Eline Meijs1Geert-Jan Dinant2Henri E J H Stoffers3Mariëlle M E Krekels4Jochen W L Cals51 Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, the Netherlands1 Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, the Netherlands1 Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, the Netherlandsgeneral practitioner2 Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, the NetherlandsFamily Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsObjectives To investigate how many general practitioner (GP)-referred venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are diagnosed during 1 year in one geographical region and to investigate the (urgent) referral pathway of VTE diagnoses, including the role of laboratory D-dimer testing.Design Historical cohort study.Setting GP patients of 47 general practices in a demarcated geographical region of 161 503 inhabitants in the Netherlands.Participants We analysed all 895 primary care patients in whom either the GP determined a D-dimer value or who had a diagnostic work-up for suspected VTE in a non-academic hospital during 2015.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcomes of this study were the total number of VTEs per year and the diagnostic pathways—including the role of GP determined D-dimer testing—of patients urgently referred to secondary care for suspected VTE. Additionally, we explored the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off.Results The annual VTE incidence was 0.9 per 1000 inhabitants. GPs annually ordered 5.1 D-dimer tests per 1000 inhabitants. Of 470 urgently GP-referred patients, 31.3% had a VTE. Of those urgently referred based on clinical assessment only (without D-dimer testing), 73.8% (96/130) had a VTE; based on clinical assessment and laboratory D-dimer testing yielded 15.0% (51/340) VTE. Applying age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs to all patients aged 50 years or older resulted in a reduction of positive D-dimer results from 97.9% to 79.4%, without missing any VTE.Conclusions Although D-dimer testing contributes to the diagnostic work-up of VTE, GPs have a high detection rate for VTE in patients who they urgently refer to secondary care based on clinical assessment only.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/5/e026846.full
spellingShingle Angel M R Schols
Eline Meijs
Geert-Jan Dinant
Henri E J H Stoffers
Mariëlle M E Krekels
Jochen W L Cals
General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands
BMJ Open
title General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands
title_full General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands
title_fullStr General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands
title_short General practitioner use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism: historical cohort study in one geographical region in the Netherlands
title_sort general practitioner use of d dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism historical cohort study in one geographical region in the netherlands
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/5/e026846.full
work_keys_str_mv AT angelmrschols generalpractitioneruseofddimerinsuspectedvenousthromboembolismhistoricalcohortstudyinonegeographicalregioninthenetherlands
AT elinemeijs generalpractitioneruseofddimerinsuspectedvenousthromboembolismhistoricalcohortstudyinonegeographicalregioninthenetherlands
AT geertjandinant generalpractitioneruseofddimerinsuspectedvenousthromboembolismhistoricalcohortstudyinonegeographicalregioninthenetherlands
AT henriejhstoffers generalpractitioneruseofddimerinsuspectedvenousthromboembolismhistoricalcohortstudyinonegeographicalregioninthenetherlands
AT mariellemekrekels generalpractitioneruseofddimerinsuspectedvenousthromboembolismhistoricalcohortstudyinonegeographicalregioninthenetherlands
AT jochenwlcals generalpractitioneruseofddimerinsuspectedvenousthromboembolismhistoricalcohortstudyinonegeographicalregioninthenetherlands