Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya
Abstract This mixed-methods study examines how men and women of different ages engaged in agriculture in Kilifi and Kiambu counties in Kenya define empowerment and describe empowerment pathways, and how empowered people are perceived by their families and communities. It also examines how emic under...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CABI
2024-03-01
|
Series: | CABI Agriculture and Bioscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-024-00238-x |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832544926066278400 |
---|---|
author | Haley Zaremba Eileen Bogweh Nchanji Nadia Guettou Djurfeldt Hanna North Vanya Slavchevska Annarita Macchioni Giaquinto |
author_facet | Haley Zaremba Eileen Bogweh Nchanji Nadia Guettou Djurfeldt Hanna North Vanya Slavchevska Annarita Macchioni Giaquinto |
author_sort | Haley Zaremba |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract This mixed-methods study examines how men and women of different ages engaged in agriculture in Kilifi and Kiambu counties in Kenya define empowerment and describe empowerment pathways, and how empowered people are perceived by their families and communities. It also examines how emic understandings of empowerment—definitions which originate from within a given cultural context—compare to quantitative empowerment measures based on externally defined indicators from the Project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI). The study design used mixed methods, with qualitative data collected through focus group discussions, life histories, and community profiles, and quantitative data collected through the pro-WEAI survey tool. Although Pro-WEAI results indicated that women and men in the study communities have achieved gender parity and experience a similar level of empowerment, qualitative findings suggest that experiences of empowerment don’t necessarily fit with Index scores. Rather, conceptualizations of empowerment by people of different ages and genders are highly diverse. Participants of all genders suggested that women’s empowerment is more limited than men’s, as women who are not. Subordinate to men risk being rejected or stigmatized by their communities. Qualitative findings suggest that empowered men are seen as “desirable” by their communities, whereas empowered women are “openly admired” and “treated as a threat/feared” in equal turn. Furthermore, results revealed that the under-involvement of men in empowerment initiatives has contributed to feelings of resentment and neglect. These findings suggest that capturing and accounting for multiple and diverse emic definitions of empowerment for different social groups, which lies beyond the scope of standardized quantitative measures, is essential to measuring and supporting empowerment in ways that are valuable and recognizable to the target group(s) of a given development initiative. Finally, results show that to support the effective empowerment of women and men, there is a need to include men, integrate safeguards for backlash against empowered women, and transform norms that hinder the acceptance of empowered women by their families and communities. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ec0d4f30f1a94c9b83339aaf6d80cea1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2662-4044 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | CABI |
record_format | Article |
series | CABI Agriculture and Bioscience |
spelling | doaj-art-ec0d4f30f1a94c9b83339aaf6d80cea12025-02-03T08:55:26ZengCABICABI Agriculture and Bioscience2662-40442024-03-015111710.1186/s43170-024-00238-xEmic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from KenyaHaley Zaremba0Eileen Bogweh Nchanji1Nadia Guettou Djurfeldt2Hanna North3Vanya Slavchevska4Annarita Macchioni Giaquinto5Bioversity InternationalCIATBioversity InternationalBioversity InternationalFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)Abstract This mixed-methods study examines how men and women of different ages engaged in agriculture in Kilifi and Kiambu counties in Kenya define empowerment and describe empowerment pathways, and how empowered people are perceived by their families and communities. It also examines how emic understandings of empowerment—definitions which originate from within a given cultural context—compare to quantitative empowerment measures based on externally defined indicators from the Project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI). The study design used mixed methods, with qualitative data collected through focus group discussions, life histories, and community profiles, and quantitative data collected through the pro-WEAI survey tool. Although Pro-WEAI results indicated that women and men in the study communities have achieved gender parity and experience a similar level of empowerment, qualitative findings suggest that experiences of empowerment don’t necessarily fit with Index scores. Rather, conceptualizations of empowerment by people of different ages and genders are highly diverse. Participants of all genders suggested that women’s empowerment is more limited than men’s, as women who are not. Subordinate to men risk being rejected or stigmatized by their communities. Qualitative findings suggest that empowered men are seen as “desirable” by their communities, whereas empowered women are “openly admired” and “treated as a threat/feared” in equal turn. Furthermore, results revealed that the under-involvement of men in empowerment initiatives has contributed to feelings of resentment and neglect. These findings suggest that capturing and accounting for multiple and diverse emic definitions of empowerment for different social groups, which lies beyond the scope of standardized quantitative measures, is essential to measuring and supporting empowerment in ways that are valuable and recognizable to the target group(s) of a given development initiative. Finally, results show that to support the effective empowerment of women and men, there is a need to include men, integrate safeguards for backlash against empowered women, and transform norms that hinder the acceptance of empowered women by their families and communities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-024-00238-xEmpowermentIntersectionalityEmic developmentGender and social inclusion |
spellingShingle | Haley Zaremba Eileen Bogweh Nchanji Nadia Guettou Djurfeldt Hanna North Vanya Slavchevska Annarita Macchioni Giaquinto Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya CABI Agriculture and Bioscience Empowerment Intersectionality Emic development Gender and social inclusion |
title | Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya |
title_full | Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya |
title_fullStr | Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya |
title_short | Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya |
title_sort | emic definitions of empowerment for just development learnings from kenya |
topic | Empowerment Intersectionality Emic development Gender and social inclusion |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-024-00238-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haleyzaremba emicdefinitionsofempowermentforjustdevelopmentlearningsfromkenya AT eileenbogwehnchanji emicdefinitionsofempowermentforjustdevelopmentlearningsfromkenya AT nadiaguettoudjurfeldt emicdefinitionsofempowermentforjustdevelopmentlearningsfromkenya AT hannanorth emicdefinitionsofempowermentforjustdevelopmentlearningsfromkenya AT vanyaslavchevska emicdefinitionsofempowermentforjustdevelopmentlearningsfromkenya AT annaritamacchionigiaquinto emicdefinitionsofempowermentforjustdevelopmentlearningsfromkenya |