$\textsf {AD}^{+}$ implies $ \omega _{1}$ is a club $ \Theta $ -Berkeley cardinal

Following [1], given cardinals $\kappa <\lambda $ , we say $\kappa $ is a club $\lambda $ -Berkeley cardinal if for every transitive set N of size $<\lambda $ such that $\kappa \subseteq N$ , there is a club $C\subseteq \kappa $ with the property that for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas Blue, Grigor Sargsyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Forum of Mathematics, Sigma
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050509425100820/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Following [1], given cardinals $\kappa <\lambda $ , we say $\kappa $ is a club $\lambda $ -Berkeley cardinal if for every transitive set N of size $<\lambda $ such that $\kappa \subseteq N$ , there is a club $C\subseteq \kappa $ with the property that for every $\eta \in C$ , there is an elementary embedding $j: N\rightarrow N$ with $\mathrm {crit }(j)=\eta $ . We say $\kappa $ is $\nu $ -club $\lambda $ -Berkeley if $C\subseteq \kappa $ as above is a $\nu $ -club. We say $\kappa $ is $\lambda $ -Berkeley if C is unbounded in $\kappa $ . We show that under $\textsf {AD}^{+}$ , (1) every regular Suslin cardinal is $\omega $ -club $\Theta $ -Berkeley (see Theorem 7.1), (2) $\omega _1$ is club $\Theta $ -Berkeley (see Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 7.1), and (3) the ’s are $\Theta $ -Berkeley – in particular, $\omega _2$ is $\Theta $ -Berkeley (see Remark 7.5).
ISSN:2050-5094