Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions

Introduction. The lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) is gaining popularity. Studies examining a surgeon's early experience are rare. We aim to report treatment, complication, clinical, and radiographic outcomes in an early series of patients. Methods. Prospective dat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory M. Malham, Ngaire J. Ellis, Rhiannon M. Parker, Kevin A. Seex
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/246989
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566582170091520
author Gregory M. Malham
Ngaire J. Ellis
Rhiannon M. Parker
Kevin A. Seex
author_facet Gregory M. Malham
Ngaire J. Ellis
Rhiannon M. Parker
Kevin A. Seex
author_sort Gregory M. Malham
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) is gaining popularity. Studies examining a surgeon's early experience are rare. We aim to report treatment, complication, clinical, and radiographic outcomes in an early series of patients. Methods. Prospective data from the first thirty patients treated with XLIF by a single surgeon was reviewed. Outcome measures included pain, disability, and quality of life assessment. Radiographic assessment of fusion was performed by computed tomography. Results. Average follow-up was 11.5 months, operative time was 60 minutes per level and blood loss was 50 mL. Complications were observed: clinical subsidence, cage breakage upon insertion, new postoperative motor deficit and bowel injury. Approach side-effects were radiographic subsidence and anterior thigh sensory changes. Two patients required reoperation; microforaminotomy and pedicle screw fixation respectively. VAS back and leg pain decreased 63% and 56%, respectively. ODI improved 41.2% with 51.3% and 8.1% improvements in PCS and MCS. Complete fusion (last follow-up) was observed in 85%. Conclusion. The XLIF approach provides superior treatment, clinical outcomes and fusion rates compared to conventional surgical approaches with lowered complication rates. Mentor supervision for early cases and strict adherence to the surgical technique including neuromonitoring is essential.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb1dc28c10b34cd4b9787dab000cb80e
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-eb1dc28c10b34cd4b9787dab000cb80e2025-02-03T01:03:48ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2012-01-01201210.1100/2012/246989246989Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody FusionsGregory M. Malham0Ngaire J. Ellis1Rhiannon M. Parker2Kevin A. Seex3Neuroscience Institute, Epworth Hospital, Bridge Road, Melbourne, VIC 3121, AustraliaGreg Malham Neurosurgeon, Suite 2, Level 1, 517 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, AustraliaGreg Malham Neurosurgeon, Suite 2, Level 1, 517 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, AustraliaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, AustraliaIntroduction. The lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) is gaining popularity. Studies examining a surgeon's early experience are rare. We aim to report treatment, complication, clinical, and radiographic outcomes in an early series of patients. Methods. Prospective data from the first thirty patients treated with XLIF by a single surgeon was reviewed. Outcome measures included pain, disability, and quality of life assessment. Radiographic assessment of fusion was performed by computed tomography. Results. Average follow-up was 11.5 months, operative time was 60 minutes per level and blood loss was 50 mL. Complications were observed: clinical subsidence, cage breakage upon insertion, new postoperative motor deficit and bowel injury. Approach side-effects were radiographic subsidence and anterior thigh sensory changes. Two patients required reoperation; microforaminotomy and pedicle screw fixation respectively. VAS back and leg pain decreased 63% and 56%, respectively. ODI improved 41.2% with 51.3% and 8.1% improvements in PCS and MCS. Complete fusion (last follow-up) was observed in 85%. Conclusion. The XLIF approach provides superior treatment, clinical outcomes and fusion rates compared to conventional surgical approaches with lowered complication rates. Mentor supervision for early cases and strict adherence to the surgical technique including neuromonitoring is essential.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/246989
spellingShingle Gregory M. Malham
Ngaire J. Ellis
Rhiannon M. Parker
Kevin A. Seex
Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions
The Scientific World Journal
title Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions
title_full Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions
title_short Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rates after the First 30 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusions
title_sort clinical outcome and fusion rates after the first 30 extreme lateral interbody fusions
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/246989
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorymmalham clinicaloutcomeandfusionratesafterthefirst30extremelateralinterbodyfusions
AT ngairejellis clinicaloutcomeandfusionratesafterthefirst30extremelateralinterbodyfusions
AT rhiannonmparker clinicaloutcomeandfusionratesafterthefirst30extremelateralinterbodyfusions
AT kevinaseex clinicaloutcomeandfusionratesafterthefirst30extremelateralinterbodyfusions