Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives

Material defects and external environmental factors increase the engineering safety risks of buried PE pipelines in service. This paper mainly reviews the failure mode and the prevention and control technology of buried PE pipelines in service, as well as comparative failure characteristics between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pengcheng Li, Fei Wang, Jiajia Gao, Dong Lin, Jian Gao, Jianguo Lu, Enxi Qiu, Chang Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2228690
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548788837810176
author Pengcheng Li
Fei Wang
Jiajia Gao
Dong Lin
Jian Gao
Jianguo Lu
Enxi Qiu
Chang Liu
author_facet Pengcheng Li
Fei Wang
Jiajia Gao
Dong Lin
Jian Gao
Jianguo Lu
Enxi Qiu
Chang Liu
author_sort Pengcheng Li
collection DOAJ
description Material defects and external environmental factors increase the engineering safety risks of buried PE pipelines in service. This paper mainly reviews the failure mode and the prevention and control technology of buried PE pipelines in service, as well as comparative failure characteristics between the buried PE and steel pipelines. The main failure factors of buried PE pipelines can be divided into four levels: the first level is third-party damage; the second level includes three failure factors, i.e., surface subsidence, joint failure, and aging failure; the third level consists of pipe piercing, crack development, and pipeline defect; the fourth level is a corrosion failure. Besides, steel and PE pipelines have various physical and mechanical properties, which lead to a significant difference in the service performance and degradation mechanism in practice. For instance, corrosion and welded joint leakage are the two common problems in steel pipelines during the service period, while PE pipelines have excellent corrosion resistance. Additionally, in order to ensure and maintain the long-term operations of PE pipelines, it is of great significance to develop and promote nonexcavation technologies of construction, renewal, and repair for natural gas-buried PE pipelines. Furthermore, based on the above studies, some further research studies on buried PE pipelines in service are suggested and discussed, e.g., (a) the service performance and degradation mechanism of buried PE pipelines in complicated environmental conditions, (b) the interaction mechanism among the engineering structure, PE pipelines, and geological environment, as well as PE pipeline geological soils coupled in multiple physical fields, and (c) the combinations of the traditional engineering risk assessment method and the numerical analysis method considering the interaction between the PE pipeline and geological environment. The results could be helpful for a better understanding of the operation conditions of buried PE pipelines, and it is also hoped that this study could provide guidance for the safe operation, maintenance, and integrity management of buried PE pipelines.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb1ba95fd5f34b34b64d972426162815
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-eb1ba95fd5f34b34b64d9724261628152025-02-03T06:13:04ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942022-01-01202210.1155/2022/2228690Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and PerspectivesPengcheng Li0Fei Wang1Jiajia Gao2Dong Lin3Jian Gao4Jianguo Lu5Enxi Qiu6Chang Liu7Institute of SafetyPipeline Management DepartmentDean’s OfficeInstitute of SafetyInstitute of SafetySchool of Civil Engineering and GeomaticsSchool of Civil Engineering and GeomaticsInstitute of SafetyMaterial defects and external environmental factors increase the engineering safety risks of buried PE pipelines in service. This paper mainly reviews the failure mode and the prevention and control technology of buried PE pipelines in service, as well as comparative failure characteristics between the buried PE and steel pipelines. The main failure factors of buried PE pipelines can be divided into four levels: the first level is third-party damage; the second level includes three failure factors, i.e., surface subsidence, joint failure, and aging failure; the third level consists of pipe piercing, crack development, and pipeline defect; the fourth level is a corrosion failure. Besides, steel and PE pipelines have various physical and mechanical properties, which lead to a significant difference in the service performance and degradation mechanism in practice. For instance, corrosion and welded joint leakage are the two common problems in steel pipelines during the service period, while PE pipelines have excellent corrosion resistance. Additionally, in order to ensure and maintain the long-term operations of PE pipelines, it is of great significance to develop and promote nonexcavation technologies of construction, renewal, and repair for natural gas-buried PE pipelines. Furthermore, based on the above studies, some further research studies on buried PE pipelines in service are suggested and discussed, e.g., (a) the service performance and degradation mechanism of buried PE pipelines in complicated environmental conditions, (b) the interaction mechanism among the engineering structure, PE pipelines, and geological environment, as well as PE pipeline geological soils coupled in multiple physical fields, and (c) the combinations of the traditional engineering risk assessment method and the numerical analysis method considering the interaction between the PE pipeline and geological environment. The results could be helpful for a better understanding of the operation conditions of buried PE pipelines, and it is also hoped that this study could provide guidance for the safe operation, maintenance, and integrity management of buried PE pipelines.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2228690
spellingShingle Pengcheng Li
Fei Wang
Jiajia Gao
Dong Lin
Jian Gao
Jianguo Lu
Enxi Qiu
Chang Liu
Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives
title_full Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives
title_fullStr Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives
title_short Failure Mode and the Prevention and Control Technology of Buried PE Pipeline in Service: State of the Art and Perspectives
title_sort failure mode and the prevention and control technology of buried pe pipeline in service state of the art and perspectives
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2228690
work_keys_str_mv AT pengchengli failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT feiwang failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT jiajiagao failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT donglin failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT jiangao failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT jianguolu failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT enxiqiu failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives
AT changliu failuremodeandthepreventionandcontroltechnologyofburiedpepipelineinservicestateoftheartandperspectives