Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats

Abstract A central feature in music is the hierarchical organization of its components. Musical pieces are not a simple concatenation of chords, but are characterized by rhythmic and harmonic structures. Here, we explore if sensitivity to music structure might emerge in the absence of any experience...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paola Crespo-Bojorque, Elodie Cauvet, Christophe Pallier, Juan M. Toro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-03-01
Series:Animal Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01848-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585531880374272
author Paola Crespo-Bojorque
Elodie Cauvet
Christophe Pallier
Juan M. Toro
author_facet Paola Crespo-Bojorque
Elodie Cauvet
Christophe Pallier
Juan M. Toro
author_sort Paola Crespo-Bojorque
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A central feature in music is the hierarchical organization of its components. Musical pieces are not a simple concatenation of chords, but are characterized by rhythmic and harmonic structures. Here, we explore if sensitivity to music structure might emerge in the absence of any experience with musical stimuli. For this, we tested if rats detect the difference between structured and unstructured musical excerpts and compared their performance with that of humans. Structured melodies were excerpts of Mozart's sonatas. Unstructured melodies were created by the recombination of fragments of different sonatas. We trained listeners (both human participants and Long-Evans rats) with a set of structured and unstructured excerpts, and tested them with completely novel excerpts they had not heard before. After hundreds of training trials, rats were able to tell apart novel structured from unstructured melodies. Human listeners required only a few trials to reach better performance than rats. Interestingly, such performance was increased in humans when tonality changes were included, while it decreased to chance in rats. Our results suggest that, with enough training, rats might learn to discriminate acoustic differences differentiating hierarchical music structures from unstructured excerpts. More importantly, the results point toward species-specific adaptations on how tonality is processed.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb1475b11aef48f8b7aae225f675062a
institution Kabale University
issn 1435-9456
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Animal Cognition
spelling doaj-art-eb1475b11aef48f8b7aae225f675062a2025-01-26T12:44:29ZengSpringerAnimal Cognition1435-94562024-03-012711910.1007/s10071-024-01848-8Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and ratsPaola Crespo-Bojorque0Elodie Cauvet1Christophe Pallier2Juan M. Toro3Universitat Pompeu FabraCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin CenterCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin CenterUniversitat Pompeu FabraAbstract A central feature in music is the hierarchical organization of its components. Musical pieces are not a simple concatenation of chords, but are characterized by rhythmic and harmonic structures. Here, we explore if sensitivity to music structure might emerge in the absence of any experience with musical stimuli. For this, we tested if rats detect the difference between structured and unstructured musical excerpts and compared their performance with that of humans. Structured melodies were excerpts of Mozart's sonatas. Unstructured melodies were created by the recombination of fragments of different sonatas. We trained listeners (both human participants and Long-Evans rats) with a set of structured and unstructured excerpts, and tested them with completely novel excerpts they had not heard before. After hundreds of training trials, rats were able to tell apart novel structured from unstructured melodies. Human listeners required only a few trials to reach better performance than rats. Interestingly, such performance was increased in humans when tonality changes were included, while it decreased to chance in rats. Our results suggest that, with enough training, rats might learn to discriminate acoustic differences differentiating hierarchical music structures from unstructured excerpts. More importantly, the results point toward species-specific adaptations on how tonality is processed.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01848-8Music cognitionRatsRhythmTonalityFamiliarization
spellingShingle Paola Crespo-Bojorque
Elodie Cauvet
Christophe Pallier
Juan M. Toro
Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats
Animal Cognition
Music cognition
Rats
Rhythm
Tonality
Familiarization
title Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats
title_full Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats
title_fullStr Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats
title_full_unstemmed Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats
title_short Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats
title_sort recognizing structure in novel tunes differences between human and rats
topic Music cognition
Rats
Rhythm
Tonality
Familiarization
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01848-8
work_keys_str_mv AT paolacrespobojorque recognizingstructureinnoveltunesdifferencesbetweenhumanandrats
AT elodiecauvet recognizingstructureinnoveltunesdifferencesbetweenhumanandrats
AT christophepallier recognizingstructureinnoveltunesdifferencesbetweenhumanandrats
AT juanmtoro recognizingstructureinnoveltunesdifferencesbetweenhumanandrats