Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.

<h4>Introduction</h4>A large portion of published evidence syntheses (ES) do not conform to established standards. There is a growing number of reviews labeled as a "systematized review", but authors do not always identify specific methodological adaptations or specify the bias...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Premji, Leyla Cabugos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291145&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540149676769280
author Zahra Premji
Leyla Cabugos
author_facet Zahra Premji
Leyla Cabugos
author_sort Zahra Premji
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>A large portion of published evidence syntheses (ES) do not conform to established standards. There is a growing number of reviews labeled as a "systematized review", but authors do not always identify specific methodological adaptations or specify the biases these may introduce.<h4>Objective</h4>The objective of this scoping review is to identify which methodological attributes common to evidence syntheses (ES) are implemented or referenced in published systematized reviews. It also aims to 1) identify and collate, where available, the reasons authors characterize their study as a systematized review 2) determine whether any justifications provided were based on resource constraints or research goals, and 3) describe common characteristics of systematized reviews.<h4>Inclusion criteria</h4>All articles that are titled as a systematized review, attempt a collocation and synthesis of existing literature, and include some methodology for their review process, will be included.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A title search will be conducted for the terms "systematized" or "systematised" in proximity to the term "review" in a selection of scholarly sources that offer broad coverage of literature in many disciplines: Google Scholar, Lens, Web of Science Core Collection (Web of Science platform), Scopus (Elsevier platform), MEDLINE (Ovid platform). Screening and data extraction will be done in duplicate. Screening will be conducted in Covidence. Data extraction will be done in Google sheets. Data extraction elements will include common methodological characteristics relating to various steps of the evidence synthesis process. Descriptive, aggregate statistics, and categorization of reasons for selecting the systematized review type are the primary planned analysis for this review.<h4>Data availability</h4>This is a registered report protocol. The data collected in this research project will be made available in the Borealis repository (https://borealisdata.ca/) upon finalization of the study.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb13560569ff41ec84d1ca55143dcadf
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-eb13560569ff41ec84d1ca55143dcadf2025-02-05T05:32:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01189e029114510.1371/journal.pone.0291145Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.Zahra PremjiLeyla Cabugos<h4>Introduction</h4>A large portion of published evidence syntheses (ES) do not conform to established standards. There is a growing number of reviews labeled as a "systematized review", but authors do not always identify specific methodological adaptations or specify the biases these may introduce.<h4>Objective</h4>The objective of this scoping review is to identify which methodological attributes common to evidence syntheses (ES) are implemented or referenced in published systematized reviews. It also aims to 1) identify and collate, where available, the reasons authors characterize their study as a systematized review 2) determine whether any justifications provided were based on resource constraints or research goals, and 3) describe common characteristics of systematized reviews.<h4>Inclusion criteria</h4>All articles that are titled as a systematized review, attempt a collocation and synthesis of existing literature, and include some methodology for their review process, will be included.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A title search will be conducted for the terms "systematized" or "systematised" in proximity to the term "review" in a selection of scholarly sources that offer broad coverage of literature in many disciplines: Google Scholar, Lens, Web of Science Core Collection (Web of Science platform), Scopus (Elsevier platform), MEDLINE (Ovid platform). Screening and data extraction will be done in duplicate. Screening will be conducted in Covidence. Data extraction will be done in Google sheets. Data extraction elements will include common methodological characteristics relating to various steps of the evidence synthesis process. Descriptive, aggregate statistics, and categorization of reasons for selecting the systematized review type are the primary planned analysis for this review.<h4>Data availability</h4>This is a registered report protocol. The data collected in this research project will be made available in the Borealis repository (https://borealisdata.ca/) upon finalization of the study.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291145&type=printable
spellingShingle Zahra Premji
Leyla Cabugos
Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.
PLoS ONE
title Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.
title_full Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.
title_fullStr Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.
title_full_unstemmed Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.
title_short Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol.
title_sort examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label a scoping review protocol
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291145&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT zahrapremji examiningthemeaningandmethodologicalcharacteristicsofthesystematizedreviewlabelascopingreviewprotocol
AT leylacabugos examiningthemeaningandmethodologicalcharacteristicsofthesystematizedreviewlabelascopingreviewprotocol