Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Postmenopausal women are more likely to experience vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as heat sensation and sweating. Recent trials have investigated fezolinetant in the treatment of VMS in postmenopausal women. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of these trials in order to es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdallah R. Allam, Mohamed Salah Alhateem, Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02279-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585954673557504
author Abdallah R. Allam
Mohamed Salah Alhateem
Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
author_facet Abdallah R. Allam
Mohamed Salah Alhateem
Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
author_sort Abdallah R. Allam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Postmenopausal women are more likely to experience vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as heat sensation and sweating. Recent trials have investigated fezolinetant in the treatment of VMS in postmenopausal women. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of these trials in order to estimate fezolinetant’s effectiveness and safety in the management of VMS in postmenopausal women. Method We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for all published randomized controlled trials. Review Manager Software was used for the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Results Our study contained five trials with 3295 individuals with a mean age of 54.4 years. The frequency of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group compared to the placebo group [MD = − 2.42, 95% CI (− 2.81, − 2.04), P < 0.00001]. Additionally, when compared to the placebo group, the severity of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group [SMD = − 0.36, 95% CI (− 0.46, − 0.26), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the fezolinetant group and the placebo group [RR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.97, 1.07), P = 0.51]. Conclusion Fezolinetant is efficient and well-tolerated in the treatment of postmenopausal women with VMS.
format Article
id doaj-art-ead347f2ebb14bd4b84569f07e38a23a
institution Kabale University
issn 2047-783X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj-art-ead347f2ebb14bd4b84569f07e38a23a2025-01-26T12:21:40ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2025-01-0130111710.1186/s40001-025-02279-yFezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trialsAbdallah R. Allam0Mohamed Salah Alhateem1Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud2Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia UniversityAbstract Background Postmenopausal women are more likely to experience vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as heat sensation and sweating. Recent trials have investigated fezolinetant in the treatment of VMS in postmenopausal women. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of these trials in order to estimate fezolinetant’s effectiveness and safety in the management of VMS in postmenopausal women. Method We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for all published randomized controlled trials. Review Manager Software was used for the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Results Our study contained five trials with 3295 individuals with a mean age of 54.4 years. The frequency of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group compared to the placebo group [MD = − 2.42, 95% CI (− 2.81, − 2.04), P < 0.00001]. Additionally, when compared to the placebo group, the severity of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group [SMD = − 0.36, 95% CI (− 0.46, − 0.26), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the fezolinetant group and the placebo group [RR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.97, 1.07), P = 0.51]. Conclusion Fezolinetant is efficient and well-tolerated in the treatment of postmenopausal women with VMS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02279-yVasomotor symptomsFezolinetantPostmenopausalMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Abdallah R. Allam
Mohamed Salah Alhateem
Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials
European Journal of Medical Research
Vasomotor symptoms
Fezolinetant
Postmenopausal
Meta-analysis
title Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials
title_full Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials
title_short Fezolinetant’s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials
title_sort fezolinetant s efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women a meta analysis and grade evaluation of randomized controlled trials
topic Vasomotor symptoms
Fezolinetant
Postmenopausal
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02279-y
work_keys_str_mv AT abdallahrallam fezolinetantsefficacyandsafetyintreatmentofvasomotorsymptomsinpostmenopausalwomenametaanalysisandgradeevaluationofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mohamedsalahalhateem fezolinetantsefficacyandsafetyintreatmentofvasomotorsymptomsinpostmenopausalwomenametaanalysisandgradeevaluationofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT abdelrahmanmohamedmahmoud fezolinetantsefficacyandsafetyintreatmentofvasomotorsymptomsinpostmenopausalwomenametaanalysisandgradeevaluationofrandomizedcontrolledtrials