Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the bone thickness of the superior semicircular canal (SSC) roof and its relationship with the roof thickness of the glenoid fossa (RGF). Methods. The cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 280 patients (560 temporal regions) were surveyed. The lowest th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahare Davvaz, Mahvash Hasani, Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Radiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1565038
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550777311199232
author Bahare Davvaz
Mahvash Hasani
Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar
author_facet Bahare Davvaz
Mahvash Hasani
Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar
author_sort Bahare Davvaz
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the bone thickness of the superior semicircular canal (SSC) roof and its relationship with the roof thickness of the glenoid fossa (RGF). Methods. The cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 280 patients (560 temporal regions) were surveyed. The lowest thickness of the SSC roof was measured and categorized based on the radiological patterns of the Cisneros et al. classification. The thickness of GF and the presence of dehiscence in this part were determined, as well. The relationship between the thickness of the GF roof and the bone thickness covering the SSC was also assessed. Results. The mean thickness of the SSC roof was 0.93 ± 0.48 mm, with no significant difference among different age groups and genders (p>0.05). However, superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) was more prevalent among females over 45 years old. Similarly, the individuals with the dehiscence of the GF roof had a 12.93-fold higher chance of SSCD development. Conclusions. The results indicated that the thickness of the bone overlying the SSC was significantly related to the roof thickness of the GF. However, an increase in age resulted in no significant change in the bone thickness of the SSC roof. Gender also had no role in changing the thickness of the bone overlying the SSC. Considering the decrease in the thickness of the SSC roof among females over 45 years of age, menopause may be responsible for this occurrence as well as for the increase in the prevalence of SSCD.
format Article
id doaj-art-ea9183b32707412f8f5fadd6d6b2fee8
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-195X
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Radiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-ea9183b32707412f8f5fadd6d6b2fee82025-02-03T06:05:51ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-195X2022-01-01202210.1155/2022/1565038Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed TomographyBahare Davvaz0Mahvash Hasani1Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar2Student Research CommitteeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyPurpose. This study aimed to evaluate the bone thickness of the superior semicircular canal (SSC) roof and its relationship with the roof thickness of the glenoid fossa (RGF). Methods. The cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 280 patients (560 temporal regions) were surveyed. The lowest thickness of the SSC roof was measured and categorized based on the radiological patterns of the Cisneros et al. classification. The thickness of GF and the presence of dehiscence in this part were determined, as well. The relationship between the thickness of the GF roof and the bone thickness covering the SSC was also assessed. Results. The mean thickness of the SSC roof was 0.93 ± 0.48 mm, with no significant difference among different age groups and genders (p>0.05). However, superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) was more prevalent among females over 45 years old. Similarly, the individuals with the dehiscence of the GF roof had a 12.93-fold higher chance of SSCD development. Conclusions. The results indicated that the thickness of the bone overlying the SSC was significantly related to the roof thickness of the GF. However, an increase in age resulted in no significant change in the bone thickness of the SSC roof. Gender also had no role in changing the thickness of the bone overlying the SSC. Considering the decrease in the thickness of the SSC roof among females over 45 years of age, menopause may be responsible for this occurrence as well as for the increase in the prevalence of SSCD.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1565038
spellingShingle Bahare Davvaz
Mahvash Hasani
Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar
Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Radiology Research and Practice
title Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_full Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_short Evaluation of Superior Semicircular Canal Morphology and Its Relationship with Glenoid Fossa Roof Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
title_sort evaluation of superior semicircular canal morphology and its relationship with glenoid fossa roof thickness using cone beam computed tomography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1565038
work_keys_str_mv AT baharedavvaz evaluationofsuperiorsemicircularcanalmorphologyanditsrelationshipwithglenoidfossaroofthicknessusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT mahvashhasani evaluationofsuperiorsemicircularcanalmorphologyanditsrelationshipwithglenoidfossaroofthicknessusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT abdolazizhaghnegahdar evaluationofsuperiorsemicircularcanalmorphologyanditsrelationshipwithglenoidfossaroofthicknessusingconebeamcomputedtomography