Blurring the lines: an empirical examination of the interrelationships among acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility
Abstract Background Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility are established implementation outcomes used to understand stakeholders’ perceptions of an intervention. Further, they are thought to provide insight into behaviors, such as adoption. To date, measurement instruments for the three o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Zoe Fehlberg, Zornitza Stark, Marlena Klaic, Stephanie Best |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Implementation Science Communications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00675-9 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of an online facilitation training program designed to support the implementation of person-centered care in Swedish healthcare—a qualitative study
by: Ewa Carlsson Lalloo, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Acceptability, Feasibility and Appropriateness of Care of Patients with Depression at Health and Wellness Centre in a District of India
by: Sourabh Saxena, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Understanding implementation research
by: Robert Mash, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review
by: Tineke E. Dineen, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework
by: Caitlin M. Reardon, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01)