Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
Class II malocclusions, after class I malocclusions, are the most frequent in the juvenile Italian population. They are most often skeletal in origin and due to mandibular retrusion. Functional devices seem to have a beneficial effect on the growth of the jaw. Long-term maintenance of the achieved r...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Domenico Aiello, Riccardo Nucera, Stefania Costa, Michele Mario Figliuzzi, Sergio Paduano |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Case Reports in Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4810584 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A Simplified Digital Approach to the Treatment of a Postpuberty Patient with a Class III Malocclusion and Bilateral Crossbite
by: Domenico Aiello, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Class III Malocclusion Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment
by: Bruna Alves Furquim, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in a sample of 12-15-year-old kurdish schoolchildren in Ranyia district
by: Zana Qadir Omer, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Using the Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device and 5-Year Follow-Up
by: Ezgi Atik, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of Severe Skeletal Class II
by: Fahad F. Alsulaimani, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)