Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome

The aim of this retrospective study is to determine whether increasing the stimulation dose of rFSH in unexpected poor responders is associated with better in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome or not. A total of forty eligible women who fulfilled our definition of poor responders and who did not ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Levent Tutuncu, Ozgur Dundar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/202804
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565207462838272
author Levent Tutuncu
Ozgur Dundar
author_facet Levent Tutuncu
Ozgur Dundar
author_sort Levent Tutuncu
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this retrospective study is to determine whether increasing the stimulation dose of rFSH in unexpected poor responders is associated with better in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome or not. A total of forty eligible women who fulfilled our definition of poor responders and who did not achieve an ongoing pregnancy in the first cycle and returned for a second higher rFSH dose IVF cycle with a long-agonist protocol were included to the study. The first low-dose cycles and the second high-dose cycles were compared to each other. Main outcome measures of the study were duration of stimulation, number of follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos, and E2 level on day of hCG injection. There were no significant differences in duration of stimulation, number of follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos, and E2 level on day of hCG injection between the first low- and second high-dose cycles. Daily dose and total dose of rFSH were significantly higher in the second high-dose cycles. Increasing the dose of rFSH in a second stimulation cycle after first unsuccessful treatment cycle will add only to the cost and discomfort of the treatment and might adversely affect pregnancy rates.
format Article
id doaj-art-ea2a2576689b45afb5233557a97bfbbe
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-ea2a2576689b45afb5233557a97bfbbe2025-02-03T01:09:02ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2012-01-01201210.1100/2012/202804202804Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF OutcomeLevent Tutuncu0Ozgur Dundar1IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa, 34668 Istanbul, TurkeyIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa, 34668 Istanbul, TurkeyThe aim of this retrospective study is to determine whether increasing the stimulation dose of rFSH in unexpected poor responders is associated with better in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome or not. A total of forty eligible women who fulfilled our definition of poor responders and who did not achieve an ongoing pregnancy in the first cycle and returned for a second higher rFSH dose IVF cycle with a long-agonist protocol were included to the study. The first low-dose cycles and the second high-dose cycles were compared to each other. Main outcome measures of the study were duration of stimulation, number of follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos, and E2 level on day of hCG injection. There were no significant differences in duration of stimulation, number of follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos, and E2 level on day of hCG injection between the first low- and second high-dose cycles. Daily dose and total dose of rFSH were significantly higher in the second high-dose cycles. Increasing the dose of rFSH in a second stimulation cycle after first unsuccessful treatment cycle will add only to the cost and discomfort of the treatment and might adversely affect pregnancy rates.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/202804
spellingShingle Levent Tutuncu
Ozgur Dundar
Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome
The Scientific World Journal
title Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome
title_full Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome
title_fullStr Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome
title_short Increasing the Stimulation Dose of rFSH in Unexpected Poor Responders Is Not Associated with Better IVF Outcome
title_sort increasing the stimulation dose of rfsh in unexpected poor responders is not associated with better ivf outcome
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/202804
work_keys_str_mv AT leventtutuncu increasingthestimulationdoseofrfshinunexpectedpoorrespondersisnotassociatedwithbetterivfoutcome
AT ozgurdundar increasingthestimulationdoseofrfshinunexpectedpoorrespondersisnotassociatedwithbetterivfoutcome