Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education

In 2015, the Harmful Digital Communication Act (HDCA or “Act”) was enacted with the aim of eliminating harm caused by digital communications. After a year of being partially in force there have been a relatively large number of cases under section 22 of the Act. Anyone over the age of 14 can potenti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adrian Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 1999-01-01
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6124
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850210510674329600
author Adrian Evans
author_facet Adrian Evans
author_sort Adrian Evans
collection DOAJ
description In 2015, the Harmful Digital Communication Act (HDCA or “Act”) was enacted with the aim of eliminating harm caused by digital communications. After a year of being partially in force there have been a relatively large number of cases under section 22 of the Act. Anyone over the age of 14 can potentially face sanctions; the first person to be convicted under the Act was an 18 year old. This paper highlights the need for young people to be aware of, and engaged with, their legal rights and obligations, and presents “Privacy Games” (www.privacygame.com), an online game that uses intuitive, image based online scenarios to teach adolescents about privacy and online safety.
format Article
id doaj-art-e99d1cfa329e48eea3bb8094d53d4f53
institution OA Journals
issn 1033-2839
1839-3713
language English
publishDate 1999-01-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Legal Education Review
spelling doaj-art-e99d1cfa329e48eea3bb8094d53d4f532025-08-20T02:09:45ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37131999-01-0110210.53300/001c.6124Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal EducationAdrian EvansIn 2015, the Harmful Digital Communication Act (HDCA or “Act”) was enacted with the aim of eliminating harm caused by digital communications. After a year of being partially in force there have been a relatively large number of cases under section 22 of the Act. Anyone over the age of 14 can potentially face sanctions; the first person to be convicted under the Act was an 18 year old. This paper highlights the need for young people to be aware of, and engaged with, their legal rights and obligations, and presents “Privacy Games” (www.privacygame.com), an online game that uses intuitive, image based online scenarios to teach adolescents about privacy and online safety.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6124
spellingShingle Adrian Evans
Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education
Legal Education Review
title Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education
title_full Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education
title_fullStr Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education
title_full_unstemmed Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education
title_short Client Group Activism and Student Moral Development in Clinical Legal Education
title_sort client group activism and student moral development in clinical legal education
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6124
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianevans clientgroupactivismandstudentmoraldevelopmentinclinicallegaleducation