The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins
<p>While global hydrological models (GHMs) are affected by large uncertainties regarding model structure, forcing and calibration data, and parameters, observations of model output variables are rarely used to calibrate the model. Pareto-dominance-based multi-objective calibration, often refer...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| Online Access: | https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/29/567/2025/hess-29-567-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832581419690360832 |
|---|---|
| author | H. M. M. Hasan P. Döll P. Döll S.-M. Hosseini-Moghari F. Papa A. Güntner A. Güntner |
| author_facet | H. M. M. Hasan P. Döll P. Döll S.-M. Hosseini-Moghari F. Papa A. Güntner A. Güntner |
| author_sort | H. M. M. Hasan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>While global hydrological models (GHMs) are affected by large uncertainties regarding model structure, forcing and calibration data, and parameters, observations of model output variables are rarely used to calibrate the model. Pareto-dominance-based multi-objective calibration, often referred to as Pareto-optimal calibration (POC), may serve to estimate model parameter sets and analyse trade-offs among different objectives during calibration. Within a POC framework, we determined optimal parameter sets for the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the two largest basins of the Indian subcontinent – the Ganges and the Brahmaputra, collectively supporting nearly 580 million inhabitants. The selected model parameters, determined through a multi-variable, multi-signature sensitivity analysis, were estimated using up to four types of observations: in situ streamflow (<span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span>), GRACE and GRACE Follow-On terrestrial water storage anomaly (TWSA), LandFlux evapotranspiration (ET), and surface water storage anomaly (SWSA) derived from multi-satellite observations. While our sensitivity analysis ensured that the model parameters that are most influential for the four variables were identified in a transparent and comprehensive way, the rather large number of calibration parameters, 10 for the Ganges and 16 for the Brahmaputra, had a negative impact on parameter identifiability during the calibration process. Calibration against observed <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> was crucial for reasonable streamflow simulations, while additional calibration against TWSA was crucial for the Ganges basin and helpful for the Brahmaputra basin to obtain a reasonable simulation of both <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> and TWSA. Additionally calibrating against ET and SWSA enhanced the overall model performance slightly. We identified several trade-offs among the calibration objectives, with the nature of these trade-offs closely tied to the physiographic and hydrologic characteristics of the study basins. The trade-offs were particularly pronounced in the Ganges basin, in particular between <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> and SWSA, as well as between <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> and ET. When considering the observational uncertainty of the calibration data, model performance decreases in most cases. This indicates an overfitting to the singular observation time series by the calibration algorithm. We therefore propose a transparent algorithm to identify high-performing Pareto solutions under consideration of observational uncertainties of the calibration data.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e982e0b9d9fd4dc8b7ab45982dbdd9aa |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-e982e0b9d9fd4dc8b7ab45982dbdd9aa2025-01-30T10:14:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382025-01-012956759610.5194/hess-29-567-2025The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basinsH. M. M. Hasan0P. Döll1P. Döll2S.-M. Hosseini-Moghari3F. Papa4A. Güntner5A. Güntner6GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, GermanyInstitute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, GermanySenckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, GermanyInstitute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyUniversité de Toulouse, LEGOS (CNES/CNRS/IRD/UT3), Toulouse, FranceGFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Science and Geography, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany<p>While global hydrological models (GHMs) are affected by large uncertainties regarding model structure, forcing and calibration data, and parameters, observations of model output variables are rarely used to calibrate the model. Pareto-dominance-based multi-objective calibration, often referred to as Pareto-optimal calibration (POC), may serve to estimate model parameter sets and analyse trade-offs among different objectives during calibration. Within a POC framework, we determined optimal parameter sets for the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the two largest basins of the Indian subcontinent – the Ganges and the Brahmaputra, collectively supporting nearly 580 million inhabitants. The selected model parameters, determined through a multi-variable, multi-signature sensitivity analysis, were estimated using up to four types of observations: in situ streamflow (<span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span>), GRACE and GRACE Follow-On terrestrial water storage anomaly (TWSA), LandFlux evapotranspiration (ET), and surface water storage anomaly (SWSA) derived from multi-satellite observations. While our sensitivity analysis ensured that the model parameters that are most influential for the four variables were identified in a transparent and comprehensive way, the rather large number of calibration parameters, 10 for the Ganges and 16 for the Brahmaputra, had a negative impact on parameter identifiability during the calibration process. Calibration against observed <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> was crucial for reasonable streamflow simulations, while additional calibration against TWSA was crucial for the Ganges basin and helpful for the Brahmaputra basin to obtain a reasonable simulation of both <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> and TWSA. Additionally calibrating against ET and SWSA enhanced the overall model performance slightly. We identified several trade-offs among the calibration objectives, with the nature of these trade-offs closely tied to the physiographic and hydrologic characteristics of the study basins. The trade-offs were particularly pronounced in the Ganges basin, in particular between <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> and SWSA, as well as between <span class="inline-formula"><i>Q</i></span> and ET. When considering the observational uncertainty of the calibration data, model performance decreases in most cases. This indicates an overfitting to the singular observation time series by the calibration algorithm. We therefore propose a transparent algorithm to identify high-performing Pareto solutions under consideration of observational uncertainties of the calibration data.</p>https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/29/567/2025/hess-29-567-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | H. M. M. Hasan P. Döll P. Döll S.-M. Hosseini-Moghari F. Papa A. Güntner A. Güntner The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| title | The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins |
| title_full | The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins |
| title_fullStr | The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins |
| title_full_unstemmed | The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins |
| title_short | The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins |
| title_sort | benefits and trade offs of multi variable calibration of the watergap global hydrological model wghm in the ganges and brahmaputra basins |
| url | https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/29/567/2025/hess-29-567-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hmmhasan thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT pdoll thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT pdoll thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT smhosseinimoghari thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT fpapa thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT aguntner thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT aguntner thebenefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT hmmhasan benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT pdoll benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT pdoll benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT smhosseinimoghari benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT fpapa benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT aguntner benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins AT aguntner benefitsandtradeoffsofmultivariablecalibrationofthewatergapglobalhydrologicalmodelwghminthegangesandbrahmaputrabasins |