Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison

Objectives. The aim of the study is to evaluate current trends and long-term durability of both drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Background. PAD affects more than 200 million people worldwide. Endovascular treatment of crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan Marzlin, M. Fuad Jan, Louie Kostopoulos, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, Tanvir Bajwa, Suhail Q. Allaqaband
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5175607
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563122275090432
author Nathan Marzlin
M. Fuad Jan
Louie Kostopoulos
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno
Tanvir Bajwa
Suhail Q. Allaqaband
author_facet Nathan Marzlin
M. Fuad Jan
Louie Kostopoulos
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno
Tanvir Bajwa
Suhail Q. Allaqaband
author_sort Nathan Marzlin
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. The aim of the study is to evaluate current trends and long-term durability of both drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Background. PAD affects more than 200 million people worldwide. Endovascular treatment of critical PAD has advanced in recent years. DES and DCB have demonstrated superiority compared to balloon angioplasty or bare metal stenting. The current literature lacks any long-term, direct comparison. Methods. A retrospective analysis was completed on patients who had femoral-popliteal interventions from June 2014 to June 2018 with either DCB or DES. Patient medical data and lesion characteristics were retrieved using the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Outcomes were analyzed through December 2019. Primary endpoint of time to clinical event-driven target lesion reintervention (TLR) and secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality were examined. Results. Four hundred eighty-three patients with a total of 563 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Three hundred fifty-nine DCB and 204 DES were performed. Of the DCBs, 132 required bailout stenting at the time of procedure. The mean time for TLR in the DES group was 1,277 days (SD 546), compared to 904 days (SD 330.1) for DCB. For patients requiring TLR, DES remained patent significantly longer (373 days longer on average) (p < 0.001). For all-cause mortality there was no significant difference at 50 months between DCB and DES (p = 0.06). Conclusions. In patients who required TLR, DES had a significantly longer length of time to reintervention vs DCB (average 373 days), although no difference in mortality was observed.
format Article
id doaj-art-e90d2d49d1734f2da68a8bef7acd3ff7
institution Kabale University
issn 1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-e90d2d49d1734f2da68a8bef7acd3ff72025-02-03T01:21:04ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5175607Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term ComparisonNathan Marzlin0M. Fuad Jan1Louie Kostopoulos2Ana Cristina Perez Moreno3Tanvir Bajwa4Suhail Q. Allaqaband5Aurora Cardiovascular and Thoracic ServicesAurora Cardiovascular and Thoracic ServicesAurora Cardiovascular and Thoracic ServicesCardiovascular ResearchAurora Cardiovascular and Thoracic ServicesAurora Cardiovascular and Thoracic ServicesObjectives. The aim of the study is to evaluate current trends and long-term durability of both drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Background. PAD affects more than 200 million people worldwide. Endovascular treatment of critical PAD has advanced in recent years. DES and DCB have demonstrated superiority compared to balloon angioplasty or bare metal stenting. The current literature lacks any long-term, direct comparison. Methods. A retrospective analysis was completed on patients who had femoral-popliteal interventions from June 2014 to June 2018 with either DCB or DES. Patient medical data and lesion characteristics were retrieved using the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Outcomes were analyzed through December 2019. Primary endpoint of time to clinical event-driven target lesion reintervention (TLR) and secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality were examined. Results. Four hundred eighty-three patients with a total of 563 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Three hundred fifty-nine DCB and 204 DES were performed. Of the DCBs, 132 required bailout stenting at the time of procedure. The mean time for TLR in the DES group was 1,277 days (SD 546), compared to 904 days (SD 330.1) for DCB. For patients requiring TLR, DES remained patent significantly longer (373 days longer on average) (p < 0.001). For all-cause mortality there was no significant difference at 50 months between DCB and DES (p = 0.06). Conclusions. In patients who required TLR, DES had a significantly longer length of time to reintervention vs DCB (average 373 days), although no difference in mortality was observed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5175607
spellingShingle Nathan Marzlin
M. Fuad Jan
Louie Kostopoulos
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno
Tanvir Bajwa
Suhail Q. Allaqaband
Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison
title_full Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison
title_fullStr Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison
title_short Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison
title_sort peripheral artery disease intervention drug coated balloon vs drug eluting stent a long term comparison
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5175607
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanmarzlin peripheralarterydiseaseinterventiondrugcoatedballoonvsdrugelutingstentalongtermcomparison
AT mfuadjan peripheralarterydiseaseinterventiondrugcoatedballoonvsdrugelutingstentalongtermcomparison
AT louiekostopoulos peripheralarterydiseaseinterventiondrugcoatedballoonvsdrugelutingstentalongtermcomparison
AT anacristinaperezmoreno peripheralarterydiseaseinterventiondrugcoatedballoonvsdrugelutingstentalongtermcomparison
AT tanvirbajwa peripheralarterydiseaseinterventiondrugcoatedballoonvsdrugelutingstentalongtermcomparison
AT suhailqallaqaband peripheralarterydiseaseinterventiondrugcoatedballoonvsdrugelutingstentalongtermcomparison