L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes

As a major energy consumer, the United States is concerned about the vital question of energy independence. Uranium resources are mainly located in the West and when their exploitation began, it did not arouse any opposition. With the rise of indigenous claims in the 1960s, as well as the awareness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Susanne Berthier-Foglar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut des Amériques 2016-12-01
Series:IdeAs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ideas/1710
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849734515422920704
author Susanne Berthier-Foglar
author_facet Susanne Berthier-Foglar
author_sort Susanne Berthier-Foglar
collection DOAJ
description As a major energy consumer, the United States is concerned about the vital question of energy independence. Uranium resources are mainly located in the West and when their exploitation began, it did not arouse any opposition. With the rise of indigenous claims in the 1960s, as well as the awareness of the danger of radiations, complaints have risen and intensified. This article analyzes the arguments of the opponents and proponents of uranium mining in the Southwest, of the Indian Nations (Navajo and Pueblo), of the conservationists and the tourist industry. Native Americans still suffer from “radiation disease, ”a colloquial term covering an array of medical conditions, and—after having outlawed every form of uranium industry—a more moderate attitude toward mining companies is observed today. Furthermore, alliances are formed between conservationists and Native Americans when their interests converge, and the rift between wealthy tribes and poor Hispanic villages widens. The former can afford to do without uranium considered too dangerous, especially if they have casino revenues, the latter have no other choice than to accept the installation of a mine if their inhabitants want to be able to find work close to home. Against all the arguments in favor of uranium mining, the opponents—and not only the conservationists—refuse the mines if they are located in areas of high visibility (near a National Park, on a “sacred”—i.e. culturally significant–mountain). As for the mining companies, they place their mines on stand-by waiting for an upturn of the uranium market or the loss oftrust of the population in hydraulic fracturing.
format Article
id doaj-art-e90aa0e8c33e47f983e811381cb3d92c
institution DOAJ
issn 1950-5701
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Institut des Amériques
record_format Article
series IdeAs
spelling doaj-art-e90aa0e8c33e47f983e811381cb3d92c2025-08-20T03:07:46ZengInstitut des AmériquesIdeAs1950-57012016-12-01810.4000/ideas.1710L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistesSusanne Berthier-FoglarAs a major energy consumer, the United States is concerned about the vital question of energy independence. Uranium resources are mainly located in the West and when their exploitation began, it did not arouse any opposition. With the rise of indigenous claims in the 1960s, as well as the awareness of the danger of radiations, complaints have risen and intensified. This article analyzes the arguments of the opponents and proponents of uranium mining in the Southwest, of the Indian Nations (Navajo and Pueblo), of the conservationists and the tourist industry. Native Americans still suffer from “radiation disease, ”a colloquial term covering an array of medical conditions, and—after having outlawed every form of uranium industry—a more moderate attitude toward mining companies is observed today. Furthermore, alliances are formed between conservationists and Native Americans when their interests converge, and the rift between wealthy tribes and poor Hispanic villages widens. The former can afford to do without uranium considered too dangerous, especially if they have casino revenues, the latter have no other choice than to accept the installation of a mine if their inhabitants want to be able to find work close to home. Against all the arguments in favor of uranium mining, the opponents—and not only the conservationists—refuse the mines if they are located in areas of high visibility (near a National Park, on a “sacred”—i.e. culturally significant–mountain). As for the mining companies, they place their mines on stand-by waiting for an upturn of the uranium market or the loss oftrust of the population in hydraulic fracturing.https://journals.openedition.org/ideas/1710uraniumAmerican WestindigenousnessecologyNavajo
spellingShingle Susanne Berthier-Foglar
L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes
IdeAs
uranium
American West
indigenousness
ecology
Navajo
title L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes
title_full L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes
title_fullStr L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes
title_full_unstemmed L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes
title_short L’exploitation des ressources minières de l’Ouest étasunien : l’uranium, les autochtones et  les environnementalistes
title_sort l exploitation des ressources minieres de l ouest etasunien l uranium les autochtones et les environnementalistes
topic uranium
American West
indigenousness
ecology
Navajo
url https://journals.openedition.org/ideas/1710
work_keys_str_mv AT susanneberthierfoglar lexploitationdesressourcesminieresdelouestetasunienluraniumlesautochtonesetlesenvironnementalistes