Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti-
The aim of this study is to examine antiN derivatives from a semantic and a pragmatic point of view, especially as far as argumentative possibilities are concerned. Two types of derivatives can be distinguished depending on the semantic content of the prefix: anti takes an adversative meaning in an...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/2022 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832581872552509440 |
|---|---|
| author | Franziska Heyna |
| author_facet | Franziska Heyna |
| author_sort | Franziska Heyna |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this study is to examine antiN derivatives from a semantic and a pragmatic point of view, especially as far as argumentative possibilities are concerned. Two types of derivatives can be distinguished depending on the semantic content of the prefix: anti takes an adversative meaning in anti1N derivatives (eg. anti-rides, antigrippe) and an antonymous meaning in anti2N derivatives (eg. antihéros, antiroman). It will be shown that the interpretation of the antiN derivative is closely related to the syntactic contexts in which it figures. For the anti1N derivatives, the ontological category of will be examined (intensional or intensional object, “attracteur” (Berrendonner 1990), etc.). Within a corpus-based approach, it will be argued that the under-specification of might account for the argumentative potential of the anti1N derivatives. For the second type of derivatives, i.e. anti2N derivatives, the antonymic relation will be more clearly defined. Finally, a hypothesis about the internal structure of the two types will be made. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e8de9a5231a74cc8ae8d1de5610c377a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1963-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Caen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discours |
| spelling | doaj-art-e8de9a5231a74cc8ae8d1de5610c377a2025-01-30T09:52:55ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232017-10-01210.4000/discours.2022Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti-Franziska HeynaThe aim of this study is to examine antiN derivatives from a semantic and a pragmatic point of view, especially as far as argumentative possibilities are concerned. Two types of derivatives can be distinguished depending on the semantic content of the prefix: anti takes an adversative meaning in anti1N derivatives (eg. anti-rides, antigrippe) and an antonymous meaning in anti2N derivatives (eg. antihéros, antiroman). It will be shown that the interpretation of the antiN derivative is closely related to the syntactic contexts in which it figures. For the anti1N derivatives, the ontological category of will be examined (intensional or intensional object, “attracteur” (Berrendonner 1990), etc.). Within a corpus-based approach, it will be argued that the under-specification of might account for the argumentative potential of the anti1N derivatives. For the second type of derivatives, i.e. anti2N derivatives, the antonymic relation will be more clearly defined. Finally, a hypothesis about the internal structure of the two types will be made.https://journals.openedition.org/discours/2022prefix anti–lexical negationantonymyargument typesintensionextension |
| spellingShingle | Franziska Heyna Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti- Discours prefix anti– lexical negation antonymy argument types intension extension |
| title | Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti- |
| title_full | Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti- |
| title_fullStr | Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti- |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti- |
| title_short | Sémantisme et potentiel argumentatif des dérivés dénominaux en anti- |
| title_sort | semantisme et potentiel argumentatif des derives denominaux en anti |
| topic | prefix anti– lexical negation antonymy argument types intension extension |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/2022 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT franziskaheyna semantismeetpotentielargumentatifdesderivesdenominauxenanti |