How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia
Countries are investing significant resources in the development of e-government, but evaluations of e-government projects are rarely conducted in a comprehensive way. In order to take the right measures and to be effective in fostering the use and raising the quality of evaluations of e-government...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Central European Public Administration Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20431 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832591553921548288 |
|---|---|
| author | Jože Benčina Tina Jukić |
| author_facet | Jože Benčina Tina Jukić |
| author_sort | Jože Benčina |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Countries are investing significant resources in the development of e-government, but evaluations of e-government projects are rarely conducted in a comprehensive way. In order to take the right measures and to be effective in fostering the use and raising the quality of evaluations of e-government projects it is important to reveal the state of the practice. The paper presents the results of the research based on identification of parameters required to be measured in order to conduct qualified evaluations of e-government projects. Thirteen such paramaters were identified via the focus group, with participants comprising (Slovenian) e-government decision-makers and researchers. Using these 13 parameters and 7 additional questions about the knowledge and use of evalution methods a questionnaire was designed and applied in a survey on Slovenian public administration. Employing a binomial test and Fisher’s combined probability test it was established that in Slovenian public administration qualified evaluations of e-government projects were not being conducted. The method has demonstrated an eligible usability both for analysing the general situation and for exposing opportunities for improvement in various specific situations.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e8dda125bc624142828326618763805b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2591-2240 2591-2259 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Central European Public Administration Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-e8dda125bc624142828326618763805b2025-01-22T10:51:57ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Central European Public Administration Review2591-22402591-22592015-12-01133-410.17573/ipar.2015.3-4.10How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of SloveniaJože Benčina0Tina Jukić1University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public AdministrationUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public Administration Countries are investing significant resources in the development of e-government, but evaluations of e-government projects are rarely conducted in a comprehensive way. In order to take the right measures and to be effective in fostering the use and raising the quality of evaluations of e-government projects it is important to reveal the state of the practice. The paper presents the results of the research based on identification of parameters required to be measured in order to conduct qualified evaluations of e-government projects. Thirteen such paramaters were identified via the focus group, with participants comprising (Slovenian) e-government decision-makers and researchers. Using these 13 parameters and 7 additional questions about the knowledge and use of evalution methods a questionnaire was designed and applied in a survey on Slovenian public administration. Employing a binomial test and Fisher’s combined probability test it was established that in Slovenian public administration qualified evaluations of e-government projects were not being conducted. The method has demonstrated an eligible usability both for analysing the general situation and for exposing opportunities for improvement in various specific situations. https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20431e-governmente-government projectevaluationmethodolgy |
| spellingShingle | Jože Benčina Tina Jukić How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia Central European Public Administration Review e-government e-government project evaluation methodolgy |
| title | How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia |
| title_full | How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia |
| title_fullStr | How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia |
| title_full_unstemmed | How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia |
| title_short | How to Assess Whether Qualified Evaluations of e-Government Projects Are Conducted? The Case of Slovenia |
| title_sort | how to assess whether qualified evaluations of e government projects are conducted the case of slovenia |
| topic | e-government e-government project evaluation methodolgy |
| url | https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20431 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jozebencina howtoassesswhetherqualifiedevaluationsofegovernmentprojectsareconductedthecaseofslovenia AT tinajukic howtoassesswhetherqualifiedevaluationsofegovernmentprojectsareconductedthecaseofslovenia |