Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters

Deep drawing is used to make a lot of different shapes. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the thickness alteration behavior of deep-drawn cylindrical cups with dimensions (41.5 mm) and high (30 mm) under the influence of diverse factors such as the radius of the die’s (Rd = 9, 6.3 mm), veloci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah Mostafa Adel, Abed Aseel Hamad, Mansor Khalida Kadhim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2025-06-01
Series:Management Systems in Production Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2025-0016
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849722965920317440
author Abdullah Mostafa Adel
Abed Aseel Hamad
Mansor Khalida Kadhim
author_facet Abdullah Mostafa Adel
Abed Aseel Hamad
Mansor Khalida Kadhim
author_sort Abdullah Mostafa Adel
collection DOAJ
description Deep drawing is used to make a lot of different shapes. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the thickness alteration behavior of deep-drawn cylindrical cups with dimensions (41.5 mm) and high (30 mm) under the influence of diverse factors such as the radius of the die’s (Rd = 9, 6.3 mm), velocity (v = 100, 300, 500 mm/min), thickness (to = 0.7, 0.5 mm), and the kind of metals used (L.c. steel and G. steel). ANSYS Workbench 21.0 software was used to implement the numerical simulation process, followed by constructing a cylindrical cup. The results reveal the highest thinning thickness (10.062% FEA, 15.626% EXP) in the curve area of the cup with low-carbon steel (to = 0.7 mm), while growth in punch speed and a decrease in the radius of the die results in higher thinning. The findings revealed a good agreement between experimental and numerical work, with the highest discrepancy being 5%. The galvanized steel metal demonstrated superiority in the cup’s curve region, where the thinning rate was less than 2.35% compared to the low-carbon steel. Working with smaller radii makes the cup break while working with larger radii makes it wrinkle more. So, intermediate radii, which are four to ten times the width of the piece, need to be worked.
format Article
id doaj-art-e89de19c52ab4e1e8f3b3eb16d04dbd8
institution DOAJ
issn 2450-5781
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Management Systems in Production Engineering
spelling doaj-art-e89de19c52ab4e1e8f3b3eb16d04dbd82025-08-20T03:11:10ZengSciendoManagement Systems in Production Engineering2450-57812025-06-0133216317010.2478/mspe-2025-0016Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different ParametersAbdullah Mostafa Adel0Abed Aseel Hamad1Mansor Khalida Kadhim2University of Technology, IraqUniversity of Technology, IraqUniversity of Technology, IraqDeep drawing is used to make a lot of different shapes. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the thickness alteration behavior of deep-drawn cylindrical cups with dimensions (41.5 mm) and high (30 mm) under the influence of diverse factors such as the radius of the die’s (Rd = 9, 6.3 mm), velocity (v = 100, 300, 500 mm/min), thickness (to = 0.7, 0.5 mm), and the kind of metals used (L.c. steel and G. steel). ANSYS Workbench 21.0 software was used to implement the numerical simulation process, followed by constructing a cylindrical cup. The results reveal the highest thinning thickness (10.062% FEA, 15.626% EXP) in the curve area of the cup with low-carbon steel (to = 0.7 mm), while growth in punch speed and a decrease in the radius of the die results in higher thinning. The findings revealed a good agreement between experimental and numerical work, with the highest discrepancy being 5%. The galvanized steel metal demonstrated superiority in the cup’s curve region, where the thinning rate was less than 2.35% compared to the low-carbon steel. Working with smaller radii makes the cup break while working with larger radii makes it wrinkle more. So, intermediate radii, which are four to ten times the width of the piece, need to be worked.https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2025-0016thickness distributionthe radius of the dievelocitythe thickness of the sheetlow-carbon steeland galvanized steel
spellingShingle Abdullah Mostafa Adel
Abed Aseel Hamad
Mansor Khalida Kadhim
Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters
Management Systems in Production Engineering
thickness distribution
the radius of the die
velocity
the thickness of the sheet
low-carbon steel
and galvanized steel
title Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters
title_full Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters
title_fullStr Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters
title_short Comparison Between Low-Carbon Steel and Galvanized Steel by Deep Drawing Under the Influence of Different Parameters
title_sort comparison between low carbon steel and galvanized steel by deep drawing under the influence of different parameters
topic thickness distribution
the radius of the die
velocity
the thickness of the sheet
low-carbon steel
and galvanized steel
url https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2025-0016
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahmostafaadel comparisonbetweenlowcarbonsteelandgalvanizedsteelbydeepdrawingundertheinfluenceofdifferentparameters
AT abedaseelhamad comparisonbetweenlowcarbonsteelandgalvanizedsteelbydeepdrawingundertheinfluenceofdifferentparameters
AT mansorkhalidakadhim comparisonbetweenlowcarbonsteelandgalvanizedsteelbydeepdrawingundertheinfluenceofdifferentparameters