Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil
Background: Electromagnetic forces in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils generate a loud clicking sound that produces confounding auditory activation and is potentially hazardous to hearing. To reduce this noise while maintaining stimulation efficiency similar to conventional TMS coils, w...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Brain Stimulation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001700 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850250585716031488 |
|---|---|
| author | David L.K. Murphy Lari M. Koponen Eleanor Wood Yiru Li Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk Stefan M. Goetz Angel V. Peterchev |
| author_facet | David L.K. Murphy Lari M. Koponen Eleanor Wood Yiru Li Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk Stefan M. Goetz Angel V. Peterchev |
| author_sort | David L.K. Murphy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Electromagnetic forces in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils generate a loud clicking sound that produces confounding auditory activation and is potentially hazardous to hearing. To reduce this noise while maintaining stimulation efficiency similar to conventional TMS coils, we previously developed a quiet TMS double containment coil (qTMS-DCC). Objective: To compare the stimulation strength, perceived loudness, and EEG response between qTMS-DCC and a commercial TMS coil. Methods: Nine healthy volunteers participated in a within-subject study design. The resting motor thresholds (RMTs) for qTMS-DCC and MagVenture Cool-B65 were measured. Psychoacoustic titration matched the Cool-B65 loudness to qTMS-DCC pulsed at 80, 100, and 120 % RMT. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded for both coils. The psychoacoustic titration and ERPs were acquired with the coils both on and 6 cm off the scalp, the latter isolating the effects of airborne auditory stimulation from body sound and electromagnetic stimulation. The ERP comparisons focused on a centro-frontal region that encompassed peak responses in the global signal while stimulating the primary motor cortex. Results: RMT did not differ significantly between the coils, with or without the EEG cap on the head. qTMS-DCC was perceived to be substantially quieter than Cool-B65. For example, qTMS-DCC at 100 % coil-specific RMT sounded like Cool-B65 at 34 % RMT. The general ERP waveform and topography were similar between the two coils, as were early-latency components, indicating comparable electromagnetic brain stimulation in the on-scalp condition. qTMS- DCC had a significantly smaller P180 component in both on-scalp and off-scalp conditions, supporting reduced auditory activation. Conclusions: The stimulation efficiency of qTMS-DCC matched Cool-B65 while having substantially lower perceived loudness and auditory-evoked potentials. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e887e93cc6644e04bdb0f9ca22fbe21b |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1935-861X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Brain Stimulation |
| spelling | doaj-art-e887e93cc6644e04bdb0f9ca22fbe21b2025-08-20T01:58:08ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2024-11-011761197120710.1016/j.brs.2024.10.003Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coilDavid L.K. Murphy0Lari M. Koponen1Eleanor Wood2Yiru Li3Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk4Stefan M. Goetz5Angel V. Peterchev6Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Engineering, Technical University Kaiserslautern, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, USA; Corresponding author. 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.Background: Electromagnetic forces in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils generate a loud clicking sound that produces confounding auditory activation and is potentially hazardous to hearing. To reduce this noise while maintaining stimulation efficiency similar to conventional TMS coils, we previously developed a quiet TMS double containment coil (qTMS-DCC). Objective: To compare the stimulation strength, perceived loudness, and EEG response between qTMS-DCC and a commercial TMS coil. Methods: Nine healthy volunteers participated in a within-subject study design. The resting motor thresholds (RMTs) for qTMS-DCC and MagVenture Cool-B65 were measured. Psychoacoustic titration matched the Cool-B65 loudness to qTMS-DCC pulsed at 80, 100, and 120 % RMT. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded for both coils. The psychoacoustic titration and ERPs were acquired with the coils both on and 6 cm off the scalp, the latter isolating the effects of airborne auditory stimulation from body sound and electromagnetic stimulation. The ERP comparisons focused on a centro-frontal region that encompassed peak responses in the global signal while stimulating the primary motor cortex. Results: RMT did not differ significantly between the coils, with or without the EEG cap on the head. qTMS-DCC was perceived to be substantially quieter than Cool-B65. For example, qTMS-DCC at 100 % coil-specific RMT sounded like Cool-B65 at 34 % RMT. The general ERP waveform and topography were similar between the two coils, as were early-latency components, indicating comparable electromagnetic brain stimulation in the on-scalp condition. qTMS- DCC had a significantly smaller P180 component in both on-scalp and off-scalp conditions, supporting reduced auditory activation. Conclusions: The stimulation efficiency of qTMS-DCC matched Cool-B65 while having substantially lower perceived loudness and auditory-evoked potentials.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001700TMSCoilHearingEEGTMS-Evoked potentialAuditory evoked potential |
| spellingShingle | David L.K. Murphy Lari M. Koponen Eleanor Wood Yiru Li Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk Stefan M. Goetz Angel V. Peterchev Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil Brain Stimulation TMS Coil Hearing EEG TMS-Evoked potential Auditory evoked potential |
| title | Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil |
| title_full | Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil |
| title_fullStr | Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil |
| title_short | Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil |
| title_sort | reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet tms coil |
| topic | TMS Coil Hearing EEG TMS-Evoked potential Auditory evoked potential |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24001700 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davidlkmurphy reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil AT larimkoponen reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil AT eleanorwood reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil AT yiruli reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil AT noreenbukhariparlakturk reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil AT stefanmgoetz reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil AT angelvpeterchev reducedauditoryperceptionandbrainresponsewithquiettmscoil |