Comment on “Perturbation Analysis of the Nonlinear Matrix Equation ”
We show that the perturbation estimate for the matrix equation due to J. Li, is wrong. Our discussion is supported by a counterexample.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Maher Berzig, Erdal Karapınar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Abstract and Applied Analysis |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/891840 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Discussion on Generalized-(αψ, βφ)-Contractive Mappings via Generalized Altering Distance Function and Related Fixed Point Theorems
by: Maher Berzig, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Estimates for the Cauchy matrix of perturbed linear impulsive equation
by: P. S. Simeonov, et al.
Published: (1994-01-01) -
Flow invariance for perturbed nonlinear evolution equations
by: Dieter Bothe
Published: (1996-01-01) -
Linear and Nonlinear Matrix Equations
by: Masoud Hajarian, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Boundary Value Problem of Nonlinear Hybrid Differential Equations with Linear and Nonlinear Perturbations
by: Said Melliani, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)