Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study

Background and Aims: Low back pain (LBP) with radiculopathy is a significant global health concern, often leading to reduced quality of life and work absenteeism. Steroid injection using the caudal epidural route offers a non-surgical approach to the management of chronic LBP with radiculopathy. Alt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shrey Goel, Sukanya Mitra, Jasveer Singh, Swati Jindal, Prateek Upadhyay, Rohit Jindal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_388_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849721846078898176
author Shrey Goel
Sukanya Mitra
Jasveer Singh
Swati Jindal
Prateek Upadhyay
Rohit Jindal
author_facet Shrey Goel
Sukanya Mitra
Jasveer Singh
Swati Jindal
Prateek Upadhyay
Rohit Jindal
author_sort Shrey Goel
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Low back pain (LBP) with radiculopathy is a significant global health concern, often leading to reduced quality of life and work absenteeism. Steroid injection using the caudal epidural route offers a non-surgical approach to the management of chronic LBP with radiculopathy. Although fluoroscopy-guided injections are the standard, ultrasound-assisted injection is emerging as an alternative. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the feasibility and effectiveness of caudal epidural blocks assisted by ultrasound versus fluoroscopy in managing LBP with radiculopathy. Material and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 patients aged 20–80 years suffering from chronic LBP and bilateral radiculopathy. Patients were assigned to ultrasound-assisted (group I) or fluoroscopy-guided (group II) caudal epidural injections. The primary outcome measure was needle placement time. Secondary outcomes included pain assessment, disability evaluation, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Chi-square tests. Results: The fluoroscopy-guided group exhibited statistically significantly shorter needle placement time (137.13 s) compared to the ultrasound-assisted group (185.60 s) (P < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain scores and disability indexes from their respective baselines. Patient satisfaction and adverse effects were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Although fluoroscopy remains the gold standard for caudal epidural injections, ultrasound-assisted procedures demonstrated comparable pain relief, disability improvement, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Ultrasound guidance shows promise as technology and expertise advance, offering a potential alternative for managing LBP with radiculopathy.
format Article
id doaj-art-e6e5a02f73144c2e8e024d0ea0280bc6
institution DOAJ
issn 2231-2730
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-e6e5a02f73144c2e8e024d0ea0280bc62025-08-20T03:11:32ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology2231-27302025-01-0141110611110.4103/joacp.joacp_388_23Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled studyShrey GoelSukanya MitraJasveer SinghSwati JindalPrateek UpadhyayRohit JindalBackground and Aims: Low back pain (LBP) with radiculopathy is a significant global health concern, often leading to reduced quality of life and work absenteeism. Steroid injection using the caudal epidural route offers a non-surgical approach to the management of chronic LBP with radiculopathy. Although fluoroscopy-guided injections are the standard, ultrasound-assisted injection is emerging as an alternative. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the feasibility and effectiveness of caudal epidural blocks assisted by ultrasound versus fluoroscopy in managing LBP with radiculopathy. Material and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 patients aged 20–80 years suffering from chronic LBP and bilateral radiculopathy. Patients were assigned to ultrasound-assisted (group I) or fluoroscopy-guided (group II) caudal epidural injections. The primary outcome measure was needle placement time. Secondary outcomes included pain assessment, disability evaluation, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Chi-square tests. Results: The fluoroscopy-guided group exhibited statistically significantly shorter needle placement time (137.13 s) compared to the ultrasound-assisted group (185.60 s) (P < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain scores and disability indexes from their respective baselines. Patient satisfaction and adverse effects were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Although fluoroscopy remains the gold standard for caudal epidural injections, ultrasound-assisted procedures demonstrated comparable pain relief, disability improvement, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Ultrasound guidance shows promise as technology and expertise advance, offering a potential alternative for managing LBP with radiculopathy.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_388_23anesthesiacaudalepiduralfluoroscopyinjectionlower back painpain managementradiculopathies
spellingShingle Shrey Goel
Sukanya Mitra
Jasveer Singh
Swati Jindal
Prateek Upadhyay
Rohit Jindal
Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
anesthesia
caudal
epidural
fluoroscopy
injection
lower back pain
pain management
radiculopathies
title Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study
title_full Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study
title_short Comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study
title_sort comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopy guided caudal epidural block in low back pain with radiculopathy a randomized controlled study
topic anesthesia
caudal
epidural
fluoroscopy
injection
lower back pain
pain management
radiculopathies
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_388_23
work_keys_str_mv AT shreygoel comparisonofultrasoundandfluoroscopyguidedcaudalepiduralblockinlowbackpainwithradiculopathyarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sukanyamitra comparisonofultrasoundandfluoroscopyguidedcaudalepiduralblockinlowbackpainwithradiculopathyarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jasveersingh comparisonofultrasoundandfluoroscopyguidedcaudalepiduralblockinlowbackpainwithradiculopathyarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT swatijindal comparisonofultrasoundandfluoroscopyguidedcaudalepiduralblockinlowbackpainwithradiculopathyarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT prateekupadhyay comparisonofultrasoundandfluoroscopyguidedcaudalepiduralblockinlowbackpainwithradiculopathyarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rohitjindal comparisonofultrasoundandfluoroscopyguidedcaudalepiduralblockinlowbackpainwithradiculopathyarandomizedcontrolledstudy