Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells

There is an ongoing debate on the mechanism underlying the pacemaker activity of sinoatrial node (SAN) cells, focusing on the relative importance of the “membrane clock” and the “Ca2+ clock” in the generation of the small net membrane current that depolarizes the cell towards the action potential th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arie O. Verkerk, Marcel M. G. J. van Borren, Ronald Wilders
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/507872
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553365740978176
author Arie O. Verkerk
Marcel M. G. J. van Borren
Ronald Wilders
author_facet Arie O. Verkerk
Marcel M. G. J. van Borren
Ronald Wilders
author_sort Arie O. Verkerk
collection DOAJ
description There is an ongoing debate on the mechanism underlying the pacemaker activity of sinoatrial node (SAN) cells, focusing on the relative importance of the “membrane clock” and the “Ca2+ clock” in the generation of the small net membrane current that depolarizes the cell towards the action potential threshold. Specifically, the debate centers around the question whether the membrane clock-driven hyperpolarization-activated current, If, which is also known as the “funny current” or “pacemaker current,” or the Ca2+ clock-driven sodium-calcium exchange current, INaCa, is the main contributor to diastolic depolarization. In our contribution to this journal’s “Special Issue on Cardiac Electrophysiology,” we present a numerical reconstruction of If and INaCa in isolated rabbit and human SAN pacemaker cells based on experimental data on action potentials, If, and intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) that we have acquired from these cells. The human SAN pacemaker cells have a smaller If, a weaker [Ca2+]i transient, and a smaller INaCa than the rabbit cells. However, when compared to the diastolic net membrane current, INaCa is of similar size in human and rabbit SAN pacemaker cells, whereas If is smaller in human than in rabbit cells.
format Article
id doaj-art-e6c7ec8dbf864c2baae94ea433e49471
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-e6c7ec8dbf864c2baae94ea433e494712025-02-03T05:54:10ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/507872507872Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker CellsArie O. Verkerk0Marcel M. G. J. van Borren1Ronald Wilders2Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The NetherlandsLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ 's-Hertogenbosch, The NetherlandsDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology and Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The NetherlandsThere is an ongoing debate on the mechanism underlying the pacemaker activity of sinoatrial node (SAN) cells, focusing on the relative importance of the “membrane clock” and the “Ca2+ clock” in the generation of the small net membrane current that depolarizes the cell towards the action potential threshold. Specifically, the debate centers around the question whether the membrane clock-driven hyperpolarization-activated current, If, which is also known as the “funny current” or “pacemaker current,” or the Ca2+ clock-driven sodium-calcium exchange current, INaCa, is the main contributor to diastolic depolarization. In our contribution to this journal’s “Special Issue on Cardiac Electrophysiology,” we present a numerical reconstruction of If and INaCa in isolated rabbit and human SAN pacemaker cells based on experimental data on action potentials, If, and intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) that we have acquired from these cells. The human SAN pacemaker cells have a smaller If, a weaker [Ca2+]i transient, and a smaller INaCa than the rabbit cells. However, when compared to the diastolic net membrane current, INaCa is of similar size in human and rabbit SAN pacemaker cells, whereas If is smaller in human than in rabbit cells.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/507872
spellingShingle Arie O. Verkerk
Marcel M. G. J. van Borren
Ronald Wilders
Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells
The Scientific World Journal
title Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells
title_full Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells
title_fullStr Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells
title_full_unstemmed Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells
title_short Calcium Transient and Sodium-Calcium Exchange Current in Human versus Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Pacemaker Cells
title_sort calcium transient and sodium calcium exchange current in human versus rabbit sinoatrial node pacemaker cells
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/507872
work_keys_str_mv AT arieoverkerk calciumtransientandsodiumcalciumexchangecurrentinhumanversusrabbitsinoatrialnodepacemakercells
AT marcelmgjvanborren calciumtransientandsodiumcalciumexchangecurrentinhumanversusrabbitsinoatrialnodepacemakercells
AT ronaldwilders calciumtransientandsodiumcalciumexchangecurrentinhumanversusrabbitsinoatrialnodepacemakercells