A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits

The Human Development Index (HDI) positions Global North countries as development benchmarks, overlooking their high environmental footprints. This perspective poses a dilemma: global adoption of Northern lifestyles risks surpassing planetary biophysical limits, while non-adoption risks perpetuating...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soumyajit Bhar, Chirag Dhara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-01-01
Series:Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15487733.2025.2454062
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832086545737187328
author Soumyajit Bhar
Chirag Dhara
author_facet Soumyajit Bhar
Chirag Dhara
author_sort Soumyajit Bhar
collection DOAJ
description The Human Development Index (HDI) positions Global North countries as development benchmarks, overlooking their high environmental footprints. This perspective poses a dilemma: global adoption of Northern lifestyles risks surpassing planetary biophysical limits, while non-adoption risks perpetuating developmental inequality. The Planetary Pressures adjusted-HDI (PHDI) from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)’s 2020 Report aimed to incorporate environmental pressures into the assessment of human development. However, countries ranking highest on the PHDI also exhibit considerable environmental footprints, limiting the PHDI’s utility as a sustainability metric. Our study introduces a revised metric emphasizing “scalability” as a pivotal facet of sustainability. Scalability, in our context, refers to the theoretical possibility of scaling a country’s historical developmental trajectory to the entire global population without exceeding planetary biophysical limits rendered in absolute terms. This emphasis on historicity and absolute environmental performance distinguishes our approach from the PHDI. Our results highlight Panama, Costa Rica, Sri Lanka, Peru, and Albania as having achieved high social progress with low environmental costs or high levels of scalable development. This signals that substantial social progress can be achieved globally without overstepping biophysical limits. Nonetheless, simple projections indicate that the environmental footprints of these countries may scale unsustainably in the future if current trends persist. This study underscores the continued need to prioritize scalability in the future and recommends shifting the narrative to countries that exemplify scalable development to provide strategic insights to the Global South.
format Article
id doaj-art-e61a48d09a8c431789a8e32565dba8ad
institution Kabale University
issn 1548-7733
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
spelling doaj-art-e61a48d09a8c431789a8e32565dba8ad2025-02-06T14:45:59ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy1548-77332025-01-0121110.1080/15487733.2025.2454062A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limitsSoumyajit Bhar0Chirag Dhara1School of Liberal Studies, BML Munjal University, Kapriwas, IndiaKrea University, Sri City, IndiaThe Human Development Index (HDI) positions Global North countries as development benchmarks, overlooking their high environmental footprints. This perspective poses a dilemma: global adoption of Northern lifestyles risks surpassing planetary biophysical limits, while non-adoption risks perpetuating developmental inequality. The Planetary Pressures adjusted-HDI (PHDI) from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)’s 2020 Report aimed to incorporate environmental pressures into the assessment of human development. However, countries ranking highest on the PHDI also exhibit considerable environmental footprints, limiting the PHDI’s utility as a sustainability metric. Our study introduces a revised metric emphasizing “scalability” as a pivotal facet of sustainability. Scalability, in our context, refers to the theoretical possibility of scaling a country’s historical developmental trajectory to the entire global population without exceeding planetary biophysical limits rendered in absolute terms. This emphasis on historicity and absolute environmental performance distinguishes our approach from the PHDI. Our results highlight Panama, Costa Rica, Sri Lanka, Peru, and Albania as having achieved high social progress with low environmental costs or high levels of scalable development. This signals that substantial social progress can be achieved globally without overstepping biophysical limits. Nonetheless, simple projections indicate that the environmental footprints of these countries may scale unsustainably in the future if current trends persist. This study underscores the continued need to prioritize scalability in the future and recommends shifting the narrative to countries that exemplify scalable development to provide strategic insights to the Global South.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15487733.2025.2454062Human developmentsustainabilityscalabilityplanetary boundaries
spellingShingle Soumyajit Bhar
Chirag Dhara
A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
Human development
sustainability
scalability
planetary boundaries
title A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
title_full A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
title_fullStr A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
title_full_unstemmed A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
title_short A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
title_sort scalability centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
topic Human development
sustainability
scalability
planetary boundaries
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15487733.2025.2454062
work_keys_str_mv AT soumyajitbhar ascalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits
AT chiragdhara ascalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits
AT soumyajitbhar scalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits
AT chiragdhara scalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits