A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits
The Human Development Index (HDI) positions Global North countries as development benchmarks, overlooking their high environmental footprints. This perspective poses a dilemma: global adoption of Northern lifestyles risks surpassing planetary biophysical limits, while non-adoption risks perpetuating...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15487733.2025.2454062 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832086545737187328 |
---|---|
author | Soumyajit Bhar Chirag Dhara |
author_facet | Soumyajit Bhar Chirag Dhara |
author_sort | Soumyajit Bhar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The Human Development Index (HDI) positions Global North countries as development benchmarks, overlooking their high environmental footprints. This perspective poses a dilemma: global adoption of Northern lifestyles risks surpassing planetary biophysical limits, while non-adoption risks perpetuating developmental inequality. The Planetary Pressures adjusted-HDI (PHDI) from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)’s 2020 Report aimed to incorporate environmental pressures into the assessment of human development. However, countries ranking highest on the PHDI also exhibit considerable environmental footprints, limiting the PHDI’s utility as a sustainability metric. Our study introduces a revised metric emphasizing “scalability” as a pivotal facet of sustainability. Scalability, in our context, refers to the theoretical possibility of scaling a country’s historical developmental trajectory to the entire global population without exceeding planetary biophysical limits rendered in absolute terms. This emphasis on historicity and absolute environmental performance distinguishes our approach from the PHDI. Our results highlight Panama, Costa Rica, Sri Lanka, Peru, and Albania as having achieved high social progress with low environmental costs or high levels of scalable development. This signals that substantial social progress can be achieved globally without overstepping biophysical limits. Nonetheless, simple projections indicate that the environmental footprints of these countries may scale unsustainably in the future if current trends persist. This study underscores the continued need to prioritize scalability in the future and recommends shifting the narrative to countries that exemplify scalable development to provide strategic insights to the Global South. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-e61a48d09a8c431789a8e32565dba8ad |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1548-7733 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy |
spelling | doaj-art-e61a48d09a8c431789a8e32565dba8ad2025-02-06T14:45:59ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy1548-77332025-01-0121110.1080/15487733.2025.2454062A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limitsSoumyajit Bhar0Chirag Dhara1School of Liberal Studies, BML Munjal University, Kapriwas, IndiaKrea University, Sri City, IndiaThe Human Development Index (HDI) positions Global North countries as development benchmarks, overlooking their high environmental footprints. This perspective poses a dilemma: global adoption of Northern lifestyles risks surpassing planetary biophysical limits, while non-adoption risks perpetuating developmental inequality. The Planetary Pressures adjusted-HDI (PHDI) from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)’s 2020 Report aimed to incorporate environmental pressures into the assessment of human development. However, countries ranking highest on the PHDI also exhibit considerable environmental footprints, limiting the PHDI’s utility as a sustainability metric. Our study introduces a revised metric emphasizing “scalability” as a pivotal facet of sustainability. Scalability, in our context, refers to the theoretical possibility of scaling a country’s historical developmental trajectory to the entire global population without exceeding planetary biophysical limits rendered in absolute terms. This emphasis on historicity and absolute environmental performance distinguishes our approach from the PHDI. Our results highlight Panama, Costa Rica, Sri Lanka, Peru, and Albania as having achieved high social progress with low environmental costs or high levels of scalable development. This signals that substantial social progress can be achieved globally without overstepping biophysical limits. Nonetheless, simple projections indicate that the environmental footprints of these countries may scale unsustainably in the future if current trends persist. This study underscores the continued need to prioritize scalability in the future and recommends shifting the narrative to countries that exemplify scalable development to provide strategic insights to the Global South.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15487733.2025.2454062Human developmentsustainabilityscalabilityplanetary boundaries |
spellingShingle | Soumyajit Bhar Chirag Dhara A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy Human development sustainability scalability planetary boundaries |
title | A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits |
title_full | A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits |
title_fullStr | A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits |
title_full_unstemmed | A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits |
title_short | A scalability-centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits |
title_sort | scalability centric perspective on global human development within environmental limits |
topic | Human development sustainability scalability planetary boundaries |
url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15487733.2025.2454062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soumyajitbhar ascalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits AT chiragdhara ascalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits AT soumyajitbhar scalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits AT chiragdhara scalabilitycentricperspectiveonglobalhumandevelopmentwithinenvironmentallimits |