Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment

Background. To assess the peeling forces exerted by different calibers of microsurgical forceps on an experimental model of epiretinal membrane. Methods. A model of epiretinal membrane was constructed using thin cellulose paper and heptanes-isopropyl alcohol 1% mixture. The model was mounted on a fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raul Velez-Montoya, Chirag Patel, Scott C. N. Oliver, Hugo Quiroz-Mercado, Naresh Mandava, Jeffrey L. Olson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/784172
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548500802371584
author Raul Velez-Montoya
Chirag Patel
Scott C. N. Oliver
Hugo Quiroz-Mercado
Naresh Mandava
Jeffrey L. Olson
author_facet Raul Velez-Montoya
Chirag Patel
Scott C. N. Oliver
Hugo Quiroz-Mercado
Naresh Mandava
Jeffrey L. Olson
author_sort Raul Velez-Montoya
collection DOAJ
description Background. To assess the peeling forces exerted by different calibers of microsurgical forceps on an experimental model of epiretinal membrane. Methods. A model of epiretinal membrane was constructed using thin cellulose paper and heptanes-isopropyl alcohol 1% mixture. The model was mounted on a force censoring device. Subsequently, flaps were created with three different microsurgical forceps of different calibers. We recorded the number of attempts, the duration of the event, and the pushing and the pulling forces during the peeling. The results were compared by a one-way ANOVA and a Fisher unprotected least significant difference test with an alpha value of 0.05 for statistically significance. Results. There was a statistical significant difference on the pulling and pushing forces between the 25 gauge (13.79 mN; −13.27 mN) and the 23 (6.63 mN; −5.76 mN) and 20 (5.02 mN; −5.30 mN) gauge, being greater in the first (). There were no differences in the duration of all events, meaning that all the forces were measured within the same period of time. Conclusions. The 25 gauge microsurgical forceps exerted the greatest mechanical stress over our simulated epiretinal membrane model and required more attempts to create a surgical suitable flap. The clinical implication of this finding is still to be determined.
format Article
id doaj-art-e600888e023949dd8a9802e26e78ee1b
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-e600888e023949dd8a9802e26e78ee1b2025-02-03T06:14:01ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582013-01-01201310.1155/2013/784172784172Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces AssessmentRaul Velez-Montoya0Chirag Patel1Scott C. N. Oliver2Hugo Quiroz-Mercado3Naresh Mandava4Jeffrey L. Olson5Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, Aurora, CO 80045, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, Aurora, CO 80045, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, Aurora, CO 80045, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80204, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, Aurora, CO 80045, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, Aurora, CO 80045, USABackground. To assess the peeling forces exerted by different calibers of microsurgical forceps on an experimental model of epiretinal membrane. Methods. A model of epiretinal membrane was constructed using thin cellulose paper and heptanes-isopropyl alcohol 1% mixture. The model was mounted on a force censoring device. Subsequently, flaps were created with three different microsurgical forceps of different calibers. We recorded the number of attempts, the duration of the event, and the pushing and the pulling forces during the peeling. The results were compared by a one-way ANOVA and a Fisher unprotected least significant difference test with an alpha value of 0.05 for statistically significance. Results. There was a statistical significant difference on the pulling and pushing forces between the 25 gauge (13.79 mN; −13.27 mN) and the 23 (6.63 mN; −5.76 mN) and 20 (5.02 mN; −5.30 mN) gauge, being greater in the first (). There were no differences in the duration of all events, meaning that all the forces were measured within the same period of time. Conclusions. The 25 gauge microsurgical forceps exerted the greatest mechanical stress over our simulated epiretinal membrane model and required more attempts to create a surgical suitable flap. The clinical implication of this finding is still to be determined.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/784172
spellingShingle Raul Velez-Montoya
Chirag Patel
Scott C. N. Oliver
Hugo Quiroz-Mercado
Naresh Mandava
Jeffrey L. Olson
Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment
title_full Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment
title_fullStr Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment
title_short Intraocular Microsurgical Forceps (20, 23, and 25 gauge) Membrane Peeling Forces Assessment
title_sort intraocular microsurgical forceps 20 23 and 25 gauge membrane peeling forces assessment
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/784172
work_keys_str_mv AT raulvelezmontoya intraocularmicrosurgicalforceps2023and25gaugemembranepeelingforcesassessment
AT chiragpatel intraocularmicrosurgicalforceps2023and25gaugemembranepeelingforcesassessment
AT scottcnoliver intraocularmicrosurgicalforceps2023and25gaugemembranepeelingforcesassessment
AT hugoquirozmercado intraocularmicrosurgicalforceps2023and25gaugemembranepeelingforcesassessment
AT nareshmandava intraocularmicrosurgicalforceps2023and25gaugemembranepeelingforcesassessment
AT jeffreylolson intraocularmicrosurgicalforceps2023and25gaugemembranepeelingforcesassessment