Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces

Purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthetic foot types on the postural stability among transtibial amputees when standing on different support surfaces. Materials and Methods. The postural stability of 10 transtibial amputees wearing solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot, single-a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nooranida Arifin, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Sadeeq Ali, Hossein Gholizadeh, Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/856279
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566651871035392
author Nooranida Arifin
Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Sadeeq Ali
Hossein Gholizadeh
Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
author_facet Nooranida Arifin
Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Sadeeq Ali
Hossein Gholizadeh
Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
author_sort Nooranida Arifin
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthetic foot types on the postural stability among transtibial amputees when standing on different support surfaces. Materials and Methods. The postural stability of 10 transtibial amputees wearing solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot, single-axis (SA) foot, and energy-saving and return (ESAR) foot was assessed. Results were compared with able-bodied participants. Anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), mediolateral stability index (MLSI), and overall stability index (OSI) were measured by computed posturography in an upright stance on firm, foam, and unstable support surfaces. Results. The mean OSI score of SACH foot was significantly lower than that of an ESAR foot when the participants were standing on a compliant surface. When compared to able-bodied group, MLSI score was significantly higher for each of the prosthetic foot groups while OSI score was significantly higher for ESAR foot only in foam condition. Conclusions. Differences between prosthetic foot types and groups (amputees versus able-bodied) can only be distinguished when individuals were standing on a compliant surface. Amputees exhibited an increased postural instability in the mediolateral direction than able-bodied individuals. Hence, the restoration of stability in the frontal plane and the enhancement of proprioception at the residual limb should be the basis of rehabilitation programs.
format Article
id doaj-art-e5cd536a0f204c5cb11379d0611086ba
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-e5cd536a0f204c5cb11379d0611086ba2025-02-03T01:03:42ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/856279856279Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support SurfacesNooranida Arifin0Noor Azuan Abu Osman1Sadeeq Ali2Hossein Gholizadeh3Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaPurpose. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthetic foot types on the postural stability among transtibial amputees when standing on different support surfaces. Materials and Methods. The postural stability of 10 transtibial amputees wearing solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot, single-axis (SA) foot, and energy-saving and return (ESAR) foot was assessed. Results were compared with able-bodied participants. Anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), mediolateral stability index (MLSI), and overall stability index (OSI) were measured by computed posturography in an upright stance on firm, foam, and unstable support surfaces. Results. The mean OSI score of SACH foot was significantly lower than that of an ESAR foot when the participants were standing on a compliant surface. When compared to able-bodied group, MLSI score was significantly higher for each of the prosthetic foot groups while OSI score was significantly higher for ESAR foot only in foam condition. Conclusions. Differences between prosthetic foot types and groups (amputees versus able-bodied) can only be distinguished when individuals were standing on a compliant surface. Amputees exhibited an increased postural instability in the mediolateral direction than able-bodied individuals. Hence, the restoration of stability in the frontal plane and the enhancement of proprioception at the residual limb should be the basis of rehabilitation programs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/856279
spellingShingle Nooranida Arifin
Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Sadeeq Ali
Hossein Gholizadeh
Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces
The Scientific World Journal
title Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces
title_full Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces
title_fullStr Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces
title_short Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces
title_sort postural stability characteristics of transtibial amputees wearing different prosthetic foot types when standing on various support surfaces
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/856279
work_keys_str_mv AT nooranidaarifin posturalstabilitycharacteristicsoftranstibialamputeeswearingdifferentprostheticfoottypeswhenstandingonvarioussupportsurfaces
AT noorazuanabuosman posturalstabilitycharacteristicsoftranstibialamputeeswearingdifferentprostheticfoottypeswhenstandingonvarioussupportsurfaces
AT sadeeqali posturalstabilitycharacteristicsoftranstibialamputeeswearingdifferentprostheticfoottypeswhenstandingonvarioussupportsurfaces
AT hosseingholizadeh posturalstabilitycharacteristicsoftranstibialamputeeswearingdifferentprostheticfoottypeswhenstandingonvarioussupportsurfaces
AT wanabubakarwanabas posturalstabilitycharacteristicsoftranstibialamputeeswearingdifferentprostheticfoottypeswhenstandingonvarioussupportsurfaces