Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
This paper analyses the judgment of habeas corpus number 126.292/SP, in which the Federal Supreme Court decided for the possibility of early execution of the penalty when there is a confirmatory decision of the conviction in Second Degree of Jurisdiction. The work has developed under the deductive m...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2018-10-01
|
| Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/180 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper analyses the judgment of habeas corpus number 126.292/SP, in which the Federal Supreme Court decided for the possibility of early execution of the penalty when there is a confirmatory decision of the conviction in Second Degree of Jurisdiction. The work has developed under the deductive method, having as technique the indirect documentation with secondary sources (bibliographic research). The paper aims to demonstrate the mismatch of the decision under the cut of the central arguments presented in the judgment, understanding that there is, initially, a difficulty of understanding as to the legal nature of the guarantee of the state of innocence and, at the end, demonstrating how the decision hurts the concept of res judicata and reinforces the absolute theories of punishment. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2525-510X |