Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?

IntroductionCompared to mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) guarantees equivalent local control and survival, with lower morbidity and better quality of life (QOL), even in the long term. However, some BCS patients consider the cosmetic result to be unsatisfactory, which may affect QOL.Mater...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Idam de Oliveira-Junior, Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva, Almir José Sarri, René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1432206/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583626234003456
author Idam de Oliveira-Junior
Idam de Oliveira-Junior
Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva
Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva
Almir José Sarri
René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
author_facet Idam de Oliveira-Junior
Idam de Oliveira-Junior
Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva
Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva
Almir José Sarri
René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
author_sort Idam de Oliveira-Junior
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionCompared to mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) guarantees equivalent local control and survival, with lower morbidity and better quality of life (QOL), even in the long term. However, some BCS patients consider the cosmetic result to be unsatisfactory, which may affect QOL.Material and methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional study included patients who underwent BCS. The patients answered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) - C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23 and Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) questionnaires, underwent cosmetic breast self-assessment and had their breasts photographed. The photographs were analyzed using Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. Cosmetic results (BCCT.core). For the categorical variables, the frequencies were calculated; for the numerical variables, the mean and standard deviation. The BCCT.core results were compared with the cosmetic results of the patients, which yielded four possible results: concordant satisfaction, discordant satisfaction, concordant dissatisfaction and discordant dissatisfaction (satisfactory BCCT.core evaluation but patient dissatisfaction). The kappa test was used for agreement between categorical variables. Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney were used to assess the relationship between QOL and cosmetic results. The ANOVA were performed with the adjusted Bonferroni correction to compare the four groups.ResultsA total of 300 patients were evaluated, 298 underwent self-assessment of the breasts (76.8% satisfactory results and 23.2% unsatisfactory) and 297 underwent BCCT.core evaluation (29.9% satisfactory results and 79.1% unsatisfactory), which had a kappa of 0.095 (p = 0.01). In the self-assessment, patients with unsatisfactory cosmetic results had worse overall health, physical, functional, emotional, cognitive, and social capacity, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, financial difficulties, body image; future prospects, side effects, breast symptoms, functional aspects, cosmetics and edema. When we used software evaluation, these relationships did not have the same proportions. In patients with “discordant dissatisfaction”, higher pain scores and worse functionality on the treated side were found.ConclusionAn unsatisfactory cosmetic result was associated with worse QOL, which may be associated with other factors, such as breast pain and functionality.
format Article
id doaj-art-e582a1a3e2fa49598b781b524af73acd
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-e582a1a3e2fa49598b781b524af73acd2025-01-28T10:20:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-01-011410.3389/fonc.2024.14322061432206Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?Idam de Oliveira-Junior0Idam de Oliveira-Junior1Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva2Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva3Almir José Sarri4René Aloísio da Costa Vieira5René Aloísio da Costa Vieira6Postgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, BrazilNucleous of Mastology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, BrazilPostgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, BrazilNucleous of Mastology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, BrazilNucleous of Mastology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, BrazilPostgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, BrazilPostgraduate Program of Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, UNESP, São Paulo, BrazilIntroductionCompared to mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) guarantees equivalent local control and survival, with lower morbidity and better quality of life (QOL), even in the long term. However, some BCS patients consider the cosmetic result to be unsatisfactory, which may affect QOL.Material and methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional study included patients who underwent BCS. The patients answered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) - C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23 and Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) questionnaires, underwent cosmetic breast self-assessment and had their breasts photographed. The photographs were analyzed using Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. Cosmetic results (BCCT.core). For the categorical variables, the frequencies were calculated; for the numerical variables, the mean and standard deviation. The BCCT.core results were compared with the cosmetic results of the patients, which yielded four possible results: concordant satisfaction, discordant satisfaction, concordant dissatisfaction and discordant dissatisfaction (satisfactory BCCT.core evaluation but patient dissatisfaction). The kappa test was used for agreement between categorical variables. Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney were used to assess the relationship between QOL and cosmetic results. The ANOVA were performed with the adjusted Bonferroni correction to compare the four groups.ResultsA total of 300 patients were evaluated, 298 underwent self-assessment of the breasts (76.8% satisfactory results and 23.2% unsatisfactory) and 297 underwent BCCT.core evaluation (29.9% satisfactory results and 79.1% unsatisfactory), which had a kappa of 0.095 (p = 0.01). In the self-assessment, patients with unsatisfactory cosmetic results had worse overall health, physical, functional, emotional, cognitive, and social capacity, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, financial difficulties, body image; future prospects, side effects, breast symptoms, functional aspects, cosmetics and edema. When we used software evaluation, these relationships did not have the same proportions. In patients with “discordant dissatisfaction”, higher pain scores and worse functionality on the treated side were found.ConclusionAn unsatisfactory cosmetic result was associated with worse QOL, which may be associated with other factors, such as breast pain and functionality.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1432206/fullbreast cancerconservative surgerybreast-conserving surgeryoncoplastic surgerycosmesisquality of life
spellingShingle Idam de Oliveira-Junior
Idam de Oliveira-Junior
Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva
Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva
Almir José Sarri
René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
René Aloísio da Costa Vieira
Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
Frontiers in Oncology
breast cancer
conservative surgery
breast-conserving surgery
oncoplastic surgery
cosmesis
quality of life
title Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
title_full Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
title_fullStr Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
title_short Do non-mammary conditions influence patients’ cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery?
title_sort do non mammary conditions influence patients cosmetic perception after breast conserving surgery
topic breast cancer
conservative surgery
breast-conserving surgery
oncoplastic surgery
cosmesis
quality of life
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1432206/full
work_keys_str_mv AT idamdeoliveirajunior dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT idamdeoliveirajunior dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT fabiolacristinabrandinidasilva dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT fabiolacristinabrandinidasilva dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT almirjosesarri dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT renealoisiodacostavieira dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT renealoisiodacostavieira dononmammaryconditionsinfluencepatientscosmeticperceptionafterbreastconservingsurgery