Naming something collective does not make it so: algorithmic discrimination and access to justice
The article problematises the ability of procedural law to address and correct algorithmic discrimination. It argues that algorithmic discrimination is a collective phenomenon, and therefore legal protection thereof needs to be collective. Legal procedures are technologies and design objects that em...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Jenni Hakkarainen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Internet Policy Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://policyreview.info/node/1600 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Adhesive Forum Selection Agreements and Access to Justice: The Function and Limits of Anti-Waiver Protections
by: Hannah L. Buxbaum -
Legislative changes in the field of consumer collective redress
by: Babović Branka
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Victims’ rights, international wrongs, and restorative justice: How to square the circle of accountability and redress for international crimes?
by: Reiter Axelle
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Access to evidence: a matter of life and death for competition law class actions?
by: Silvia Bessa e Venda
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Cases: Are Divergences an Obstacle to Effective Access to Justice?
by: Urša Jeretina, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)