Toutes pour une, une pour toustes ? Ou : que faire du masculin à valeur générique ?
In general, the criticism on which non-sexist / inclusive language guides are based concerns masculine nouns with generic value. Is this generic function embedded in the grammar, discursively negotiated or the result of an inferential calculation? A whole series of (meta)strategies have been propose...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Association Genres, sexualités, langage
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Glad! |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/glad/3619 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In general, the criticism on which non-sexist / inclusive language guides are based concerns masculine nouns with generic value. Is this generic function embedded in the grammar, discursively negotiated or the result of an inferential calculation? A whole series of (meta)strategies have been proposed to avoid generically intended masculine forms. If all these strategies have the same objective, it can also be observed that there is no single one that is universally accepted. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2551-0819 |