The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed.
The debate on the gross domestic product (GDP) and whether or not it is appropriate to measure countries' or people's well-being has been going on for approximately 30 years. It was reinvigorated in the wake of the document drawn up by the Sarkozy-Stiglitz Commission and then weakened from...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
AIMS Press
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | National Accounting Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/NAR.2025005 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850125060851892224 |
|---|---|
| author | Guido Ferrari José Mondéjar Jiménez Yanyun Zhao Guillermo Ceballos Santamaria |
| author_facet | Guido Ferrari José Mondéjar Jiménez Yanyun Zhao Guillermo Ceballos Santamaria |
| author_sort | Guido Ferrari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The debate on the gross domestic product (GDP) and whether or not it is appropriate to measure countries' or people's well-being has been going on for approximately 30 years. It was reinvigorated in the wake of the document drawn up by the Sarkozy-Stiglitz Commission and then weakened from 2020 onward until almost disappearing. In our opinion, it is worth returning to the issue, as many aspects have not been well specified and approached. In this paper, we discuss the state of the art, examining and showing how some points are inappropriately posed, misunderstood, or even wrong. The basic misunderstanding is that GDP can be an indicator of well-being. This is not the case, as underlined by the Commission and confirmed by the analysis that we conducted here. It is somewhat commonly agreed among many authors and in the Beyond GDP initiative that GDP should be set aside and replaced by some alternative indices. We show that GDP cannot be replaced or transformed into a sustainable indicator that includes both production and natural resources depletion, environment, and social capital; instead, it would be useful to combine it with some alternative indicators to obtain more complete information. Furthermore, we show that it is not a good idea to oppose sustainable economic growth. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e4e4d02834c14f0bbce2611f9351bf71 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2689-3010 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | AIMS Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | National Accounting Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-e4e4d02834c14f0bbce2611f9351bf712025-08-20T02:34:10ZengAIMS PressNational Accounting Review2689-30102025-03-017110612410.3934/NAR.2025005The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed.Guido Ferrari0José Mondéjar Jiménez1Yanyun Zhao2Guillermo Ceballos Santamaria3Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti", University of Florence, viale Morgagni, 59-50134 Firenze, ItalyFaculty of Social Sciences of Cuenca, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca Campus, Camino Pozuelo, s/n, 16071 Cuenca, SpainSchool of Statistic, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, ChinaFaculty of Social Sciences of Cuenca, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca Campus, Camino Pozuelo, s/n, 16071 Cuenca, SpainThe debate on the gross domestic product (GDP) and whether or not it is appropriate to measure countries' or people's well-being has been going on for approximately 30 years. It was reinvigorated in the wake of the document drawn up by the Sarkozy-Stiglitz Commission and then weakened from 2020 onward until almost disappearing. In our opinion, it is worth returning to the issue, as many aspects have not been well specified and approached. In this paper, we discuss the state of the art, examining and showing how some points are inappropriately posed, misunderstood, or even wrong. The basic misunderstanding is that GDP can be an indicator of well-being. This is not the case, as underlined by the Commission and confirmed by the analysis that we conducted here. It is somewhat commonly agreed among many authors and in the Beyond GDP initiative that GDP should be set aside and replaced by some alternative indices. We show that GDP cannot be replaced or transformed into a sustainable indicator that includes both production and natural resources depletion, environment, and social capital; instead, it would be useful to combine it with some alternative indicators to obtain more complete information. Furthermore, we show that it is not a good idea to oppose sustainable economic growth.https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/NAR.2025005gdpdebatesarkozy-stiglitz commissionsustainabilitywell-beinggreen gdpwell-being indicators |
| spellingShingle | Guido Ferrari José Mondéjar Jiménez Yanyun Zhao Guillermo Ceballos Santamaria The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed. National Accounting Review gdp debate sarkozy-stiglitz commission sustainability well-being green gdp well-being indicators |
| title | The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed. |
| title_full | The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed. |
| title_fullStr | The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed. |
| title_short | The Debate on GDP. Where we are at. Or, how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed. |
| title_sort | debate on gdp where we are at or how to run to its aid with contempt of danger and hope to get out unharmed |
| topic | gdp debate sarkozy-stiglitz commission sustainability well-being green gdp well-being indicators |
| url | https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/NAR.2025005 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guidoferrari thedebateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT josemondejarjimenez thedebateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT yanyunzhao thedebateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT guillermoceballossantamaria thedebateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT guidoferrari debateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT josemondejarjimenez debateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT yanyunzhao debateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed AT guillermoceballossantamaria debateongdpwhereweareatorhowtoruntoitsaidwithcontemptofdangerandhopetogetoutunharmed |