Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens

The comb, as a secondary sexual characteristic in chickens, serves as an important indicator of sexual maturity and potential reproductive. This study explored the relationship between comb types and production performance in Tianfu G01 chickens. Single-comb hens exhibited significantly lower laying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuxin Zhou, Hengyong Xu, Wei Du, Yuxiang Lu, Zhi Hu, Qingqing Deng, Xi Wang, Yiping Liu, Yao Zhang, Yan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124010496
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591942418956288
author Yuxin Zhou
Hengyong Xu
Wei Du
Yuxiang Lu
Zhi Hu
Qingqing Deng
Xi Wang
Yiping Liu
Yao Zhang
Yan Wang
author_facet Yuxin Zhou
Hengyong Xu
Wei Du
Yuxiang Lu
Zhi Hu
Qingqing Deng
Xi Wang
Yiping Liu
Yao Zhang
Yan Wang
author_sort Yuxin Zhou
collection DOAJ
description The comb, as a secondary sexual characteristic in chickens, serves as an important indicator of sexual maturity and potential reproductive. This study explored the relationship between comb types and production performance in Tianfu G01 chickens. Single-comb hens exhibited significantly lower laying rates compared to rose-comb hens during specific weeks (24-26, 27-28, 30, 32-34, and 38-43) but had higher average egg weights at 22, 23, 33, and 36-43 weeks. There were no significant differences in initial egg weight or 300-day body weight between the comb types. However, rose-comb hens showed higher 300-day egg production and green-shell egg rates, while single-comb hens had better egg weight and survival rates. The uterine morphology of single-comb hens was superior, with longer and wider uterine villi. Blood analysis revealed higher calcitonin and parathyroid hormone levels in single-comb hens, while rose-comb hens had higher blood calcium and phosphorus levels. In roosters, single-comb had higher germ cell counts, thicker seminiferous epithelium, and better semen quality, leading to improved fertilization rates and hatchability. These findings suggest that comb type influences both reproductive and production traits in Tianfu G01 chickens, with rose-comb favoring egg production and single-comb favoring egg weight and survival.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4d87ca5b34346df818382f664486b2d
institution Kabale University
issn 0032-5791
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj-art-e4d87ca5b34346df818382f664486b2d2025-01-22T05:40:11ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912025-01-011041104471Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickensYuxin Zhou0Hengyong Xu1Wei Du2Yuxiang Lu3Zhi Hu4Qingqing Deng5Xi Wang6Yiping Liu7Yao Zhang8Yan Wang9State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding), Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; Correspondence author.The comb, as a secondary sexual characteristic in chickens, serves as an important indicator of sexual maturity and potential reproductive. This study explored the relationship between comb types and production performance in Tianfu G01 chickens. Single-comb hens exhibited significantly lower laying rates compared to rose-comb hens during specific weeks (24-26, 27-28, 30, 32-34, and 38-43) but had higher average egg weights at 22, 23, 33, and 36-43 weeks. There were no significant differences in initial egg weight or 300-day body weight between the comb types. However, rose-comb hens showed higher 300-day egg production and green-shell egg rates, while single-comb hens had better egg weight and survival rates. The uterine morphology of single-comb hens was superior, with longer and wider uterine villi. Blood analysis revealed higher calcitonin and parathyroid hormone levels in single-comb hens, while rose-comb hens had higher blood calcium and phosphorus levels. In roosters, single-comb had higher germ cell counts, thicker seminiferous epithelium, and better semen quality, leading to improved fertilization rates and hatchability. These findings suggest that comb type influences both reproductive and production traits in Tianfu G01 chickens, with rose-comb favoring egg production and single-comb favoring egg weight and survival.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124010496Tianfu G01 chickensComb typeUterusTestisProduction performance
spellingShingle Yuxin Zhou
Hengyong Xu
Wei Du
Yuxiang Lu
Zhi Hu
Qingqing Deng
Xi Wang
Yiping Liu
Yao Zhang
Yan Wang
Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens
Poultry Science
Tianfu G01 chickens
Comb type
Uterus
Testis
Production performance
title Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens
title_full Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens
title_fullStr Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens
title_full_unstemmed Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens
title_short Impact of comb type on production performance, egg production quality, reproductive performance, and blood biochemical indexes in Tianfu chickens
title_sort impact of comb type on production performance egg production quality reproductive performance and blood biochemical indexes in tianfu chickens
topic Tianfu G01 chickens
Comb type
Uterus
Testis
Production performance
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124010496
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxinzhou impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT hengyongxu impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT weidu impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT yuxianglu impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT zhihu impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT qingqingdeng impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT xiwang impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT yipingliu impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT yaozhang impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens
AT yanwang impactofcombtypeonproductionperformanceeggproductionqualityreproductiveperformanceandbloodbiochemicalindexesintianfuchickens