Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices

In a previous study, we have demonstrated that beryllium oxide (BeO) film grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on Si and III-V MOS devices has excellent electrical and physical characteristics. In this paper, we compare the electrical characteristics of inserting an ultrathin interfacial barrier l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. H. Yum, J. Oh, Todd. W. Hudnall, C. W. Bielawski, G. Bersuker, S. K. Banerjee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Active and Passive Electronic Components
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/359580
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562086892273664
author J. H. Yum
J. Oh
Todd. W. Hudnall
C. W. Bielawski
G. Bersuker
S. K. Banerjee
author_facet J. H. Yum
J. Oh
Todd. W. Hudnall
C. W. Bielawski
G. Bersuker
S. K. Banerjee
author_sort J. H. Yum
collection DOAJ
description In a previous study, we have demonstrated that beryllium oxide (BeO) film grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on Si and III-V MOS devices has excellent electrical and physical characteristics. In this paper, we compare the electrical characteristics of inserting an ultrathin interfacial barrier layer such as SiO2, Al2O3, or BeO between the HfO2 gate dielectric and Si substrate in metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) and n-channel inversion type metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). Si MOSCAPs and MOSFETs with a BeO/HfO2 gate stack exhibited high performance and reliability characteristics, including a 34% improvement in drive current, slightly better reduction in subthreshold swing, 42% increase in effective electron mobility at an electric field of 1 MV/cm, slightly low equivalent oxide thickness, less stress-induced flat-band voltage shift, less stress induced leakage current, and less interface charge.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4cacb66b3d347798b435cad294ead1e
institution Kabale University
issn 0882-7516
1563-5031
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Active and Passive Electronic Components
spelling doaj-art-e4cacb66b3d347798b435cad294ead1e2025-02-03T01:23:32ZengWileyActive and Passive Electronic Components0882-75161563-50312012-01-01201210.1155/2012/359580359580Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor DevicesJ. H. Yum0J. Oh1Todd. W. Hudnall2C. W. Bielawski3G. Bersuker4S. K. Banerjee5Microelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78758, USASchool of Integrated Technology, College of Engineering, Yonsei University, 162-1 Songdo-dong, Incheon 406-840, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USADepartment of Chemistry, UT, Austin, TX 78712, USASEMATECH, 2706 Montopolis Drive, Austin, TX 78741, USAMicroelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78758, USAIn a previous study, we have demonstrated that beryllium oxide (BeO) film grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on Si and III-V MOS devices has excellent electrical and physical characteristics. In this paper, we compare the electrical characteristics of inserting an ultrathin interfacial barrier layer such as SiO2, Al2O3, or BeO between the HfO2 gate dielectric and Si substrate in metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) and n-channel inversion type metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). Si MOSCAPs and MOSFETs with a BeO/HfO2 gate stack exhibited high performance and reliability characteristics, including a 34% improvement in drive current, slightly better reduction in subthreshold swing, 42% increase in effective electron mobility at an electric field of 1 MV/cm, slightly low equivalent oxide thickness, less stress-induced flat-band voltage shift, less stress induced leakage current, and less interface charge.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/359580
spellingShingle J. H. Yum
J. Oh
Todd. W. Hudnall
C. W. Bielawski
G. Bersuker
S. K. Banerjee
Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices
Active and Passive Electronic Components
title Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices
title_full Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices
title_fullStr Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices
title_short Comparative Study of SiO2, Al2O3, and BeO Ultrathin Interfacial Barrier Layers in Si Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices
title_sort comparative study of sio2 al2o3 and beo ultrathin interfacial barrier layers in si metal oxide semiconductor devices
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/359580
work_keys_str_mv AT jhyum comparativestudyofsio2al2o3andbeoultrathininterfacialbarrierlayersinsimetaloxidesemiconductordevices
AT joh comparativestudyofsio2al2o3andbeoultrathininterfacialbarrierlayersinsimetaloxidesemiconductordevices
AT toddwhudnall comparativestudyofsio2al2o3andbeoultrathininterfacialbarrierlayersinsimetaloxidesemiconductordevices
AT cwbielawski comparativestudyofsio2al2o3andbeoultrathininterfacialbarrierlayersinsimetaloxidesemiconductordevices
AT gbersuker comparativestudyofsio2al2o3andbeoultrathininterfacialbarrierlayersinsimetaloxidesemiconductordevices
AT skbanerjee comparativestudyofsio2al2o3andbeoultrathininterfacialbarrierlayersinsimetaloxidesemiconductordevices