3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study)
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the roughness of the new E-max brackets with two commercially available ceramic brackets in the markets. The bracket roughness of three different types was compared. The brackets were divided into three groups: (1) E-max brackets (IPS E-max press, Ivoclar, Ge...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Tishk International University
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/eajse/article/view/23 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832096711085916160 |
|---|---|
| author | Omar Sabah Isra Dilshad Sana Rizgar |
| author_facet | Omar Sabah Isra Dilshad Sana Rizgar |
| author_sort | Omar Sabah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The purpose of the study is to evaluate the roughness of the new E-max brackets with two commercially available ceramic brackets in the markets. The bracket roughness of three different types was compared. The brackets were divided into three groups: (1) E-max brackets (IPS E-max press, Ivoclar, Germany), (2) Gemini clear brackets (Unitek, 3M, USA), and (3) Discovery pearl ceramic brackets (Dentaurum, Germany). The roughness of each bracket was tested through a 3D laser microscope (VK-X1100, Keyence, Germany). The Gemini clear showed a uniform surface significantly smoother than both E-max and Discovery pearl brackets with the latter having the highest roughness parameter. As a result of the noticeable tested brackets, E-max material is now and will continue to be a common choice for modern, aesthetically pleasing brackets, despite having a rougher surface than Gemini Clear but less than Discovery Pearl. To reduce roughness, the E-max brackets could benefit from better polishing and finishing. Hence, to lessen friction. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e48a919027704d1e8c3b4933d2c23c89 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2414-5629 2414-5602 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Tishk International University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-e48a919027704d1e8c3b4933d2c23c892025-02-05T12:37:04ZengTishk International UniversityEurasian Journal of Science and Engineering2414-56292414-56022024-06-0110291101https://doi.org/10.23918/eajse.v10i2p73D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study)Omar Sabah0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-1460Isra Dilshad1https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3185-5574Sana Rizgar2Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tishk Internationa University, Erbil, Iraq ² Private clinic, Erbil, Iraq Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tishk Internationa University, Erbil, IraqDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tishk Internationa University, Erbil, IraqThe purpose of the study is to evaluate the roughness of the new E-max brackets with two commercially available ceramic brackets in the markets. The bracket roughness of three different types was compared. The brackets were divided into three groups: (1) E-max brackets (IPS E-max press, Ivoclar, Germany), (2) Gemini clear brackets (Unitek, 3M, USA), and (3) Discovery pearl ceramic brackets (Dentaurum, Germany). The roughness of each bracket was tested through a 3D laser microscope (VK-X1100, Keyence, Germany). The Gemini clear showed a uniform surface significantly smoother than both E-max and Discovery pearl brackets with the latter having the highest roughness parameter. As a result of the noticeable tested brackets, E-max material is now and will continue to be a common choice for modern, aesthetically pleasing brackets, despite having a rougher surface than Gemini Clear but less than Discovery Pearl. To reduce roughness, the E-max brackets could benefit from better polishing and finishing. Hence, to lessen friction.https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/eajse/article/view/23ceramic bracketsips e-max pressorthodontic |
| spellingShingle | Omar Sabah Isra Dilshad Sana Rizgar 3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study) Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering ceramic brackets ips e-max press orthodontic |
| title | 3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study) |
| title_full | 3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study) |
| title_fullStr | 3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study) |
| title_full_unstemmed | 3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study) |
| title_short | 3D Slot Roughness Evaluation Of Novel Orthodontic Brackets With Two Commercial Brackets (An İn-Vitro Study) |
| title_sort | 3d slot roughness evaluation of novel orthodontic brackets with two commercial brackets an in vitro study |
| topic | ceramic brackets ips e-max press orthodontic |
| url | https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/eajse/article/view/23 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT omarsabah 3dslotroughnessevaluationofnovelorthodonticbracketswithtwocommercialbracketsaninvitrostudy AT isradilshad 3dslotroughnessevaluationofnovelorthodonticbracketswithtwocommercialbracketsaninvitrostudy AT sanarizgar 3dslotroughnessevaluationofnovelorthodonticbracketswithtwocommercialbracketsaninvitrostudy |