After Zigzagging Between Extremes, Finally Common Sense? Will Belgium Return to Reasonable Rules on Illegally Obtained Evidence?
In the absence of statutory rules on the matter, Belgian courts traditionally applied a strict exclusionary rule for illegally gathered evidence and its fruits. The Court of Cassation in 2003 made a spectacular U-turn and prohibited exclusion of illegally obtained evidence by criminal courts, with o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Frank Verbruggen, Charlotte Conings |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/500 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Mechanisms of elimination of undesired evidence from criminal trial: a comparative approach
by: Hanna Kuczyńska
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Editorial of dossier “Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Process. Between the Establishment of the Truth, Human Rights and the Efficiency of Proceedings”
by: Karolina Kremens, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Evidence Obtained Through Unlawful Means During Police Custody
by: Mohamad Ismail Bin Mohamad Yunus
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Current Aspects for Searching and Returning Assets: Problems and Perspectives for Ukraine
by: P. S. Bilevskyi
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Exclusion without trial? Exclusion of evidence and abbreviated procedures
by: Thomas Weigend
Published: (2021-03-01)