Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia

Background. Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. Objectives. The objective of this analysis was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margo S. Harrison, Tewodros Liyew, Ephrem Kirub, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5620987
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553978429177856
author Margo S. Harrison
Tewodros Liyew
Ephrem Kirub
Biruk Teshome
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Margaret Muldrow
Teklemariam Yarinbab
author_facet Margo S. Harrison
Tewodros Liyew
Ephrem Kirub
Biruk Teshome
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Margaret Muldrow
Teklemariam Yarinbab
author_sort Margo S. Harrison
collection DOAJ
description Background. Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. Objectives. The objective of this analysis was to determine what risk factors were associated with cesarean birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4. Methods. This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1,000 women who delivered at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital in the summer and fall of 2019. Results. Women in Robson Groups 2 and 4 comprised 11.4% (n = 113) of the total population (n = 993). The cesarean birth rate in Robson Group 2 (n = 56) was 37.5% and in Robson Group 4 (n = 57) was 24.6%. In Robson Group 2, of all prelabor cesareans (n = 5), one birth was elective cesarean by maternal request; the intrapartum cesarean births (n = 16) mostly had a maternal or fetal indication (93.8%), with one birth (6.2%) indicated by “failed induction or augmentation,” which was a combined indication. In Robson Group 4, all 4 women delivered by prelabor cesarean had a maternal indication (one was missing data), and 3 of the intrapartum cesareans were indicated by “failed induction or augmentation.” In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 2, having a labor duration of “not applicable” increased the risk of cesarean delivery (RR 2.9, CI (1.5, 5.4)). The odds of requiring maternal antibiotics was the only notable outcome with increased risk (RR 11.1, CI (1.9, 64.9)). In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 4, having a labor longer than 24 hours trended towards a significant association with cesarean (RR 3.6, CI (0.9, 14.3)), and women had a more dilated cervix on admission trended toward having a lower odds of cesarean (RR 0.8, CI (0.6, 1.0)). Conclusion. Though rates of primary cesarean birth among women who have a term, single, cephalic fetus and are induced, augmented, or undergone prelabor cesarean birth are high, those that occur intrapartum seem to be associated with appropriate risk factors and indications, though we cannot say this definitely as we did not perform an audit. More research is needed on the prelabor subgroup as a separate entity.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4201c42538845af947e60a868452555
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9589
1687-9597
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Obstetrics and Gynecology International
spelling doaj-art-e4201c42538845af947e60a8684525552025-02-03T05:52:42ZengWileyObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972020-01-01202010.1155/2020/56209875620987Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, EthiopiaMargo S. Harrison0Tewodros Liyew1Ephrem Kirub2Biruk Teshome3Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano4Margaret Muldrow5Teklemariam Yarinbab6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USAMizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Aman, Bench Maji Zone, EthiopiaMizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Aman, Bench Maji Zone, EthiopiaMizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Aman, Bench Maji Zone, EthiopiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USAVillage Health Partnership, Denver, CO, USAMizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Aman, Bench Maji Zone, EthiopiaBackground. Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. Objectives. The objective of this analysis was to determine what risk factors were associated with cesarean birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4. Methods. This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1,000 women who delivered at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital in the summer and fall of 2019. Results. Women in Robson Groups 2 and 4 comprised 11.4% (n = 113) of the total population (n = 993). The cesarean birth rate in Robson Group 2 (n = 56) was 37.5% and in Robson Group 4 (n = 57) was 24.6%. In Robson Group 2, of all prelabor cesareans (n = 5), one birth was elective cesarean by maternal request; the intrapartum cesarean births (n = 16) mostly had a maternal or fetal indication (93.8%), with one birth (6.2%) indicated by “failed induction or augmentation,” which was a combined indication. In Robson Group 4, all 4 women delivered by prelabor cesarean had a maternal indication (one was missing data), and 3 of the intrapartum cesareans were indicated by “failed induction or augmentation.” In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 2, having a labor duration of “not applicable” increased the risk of cesarean delivery (RR 2.9, CI (1.5, 5.4)). The odds of requiring maternal antibiotics was the only notable outcome with increased risk (RR 11.1, CI (1.9, 64.9)). In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 4, having a labor longer than 24 hours trended towards a significant association with cesarean (RR 3.6, CI (0.9, 14.3)), and women had a more dilated cervix on admission trended toward having a lower odds of cesarean (RR 0.8, CI (0.6, 1.0)). Conclusion. Though rates of primary cesarean birth among women who have a term, single, cephalic fetus and are induced, augmented, or undergone prelabor cesarean birth are high, those that occur intrapartum seem to be associated with appropriate risk factors and indications, though we cannot say this definitely as we did not perform an audit. More research is needed on the prelabor subgroup as a separate entity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5620987
spellingShingle Margo S. Harrison
Tewodros Liyew
Ephrem Kirub
Biruk Teshome
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Margaret Muldrow
Teklemariam Yarinbab
Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
title Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_full Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_fullStr Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_short Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_sort use of cesarean birth among robson groups 2 and 4 at mizan tepi university hospital ethiopia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5620987
work_keys_str_mv AT margosharrison useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT tewodrosliyew useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT ephremkirub useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT birukteshome useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT andreajimenezzambrano useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT margaretmuldrow useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT teklemariamyarinbab useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia