Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts?
For cooperation to succeed, individuals must often ‘delay gratification’ and forego an immediate reward for a larger delayed reward that is co-produced through the cooperative act. This experiment asked whether a promise to wait increased children’s propensity to coordinate with their partner by wai...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Royal Society
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.250392 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850034311787446272 |
|---|---|
| author | Rebecca Koomen Owen Waddington Leonor Santana Miranda Goncalves Bahar Köymen Keith Jensen |
| author_facet | Rebecca Koomen Owen Waddington Leonor Santana Miranda Goncalves Bahar Köymen Keith Jensen |
| author_sort | Rebecca Koomen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For cooperation to succeed, individuals must often ‘delay gratification’ and forego an immediate reward for a larger delayed reward that is co-produced through the cooperative act. This experiment asked whether a promise to wait increased children’s propensity to coordinate with their partner by waiting to eat their own treat. In this first cooperative marshmallow test conducted online, 5- to 6-year-old UK-based children (n = 66) interacted from their homes via video call with a confederate child who either promised not to eat his treat (promise condition) or expressed the possibility that he might eat his treat (social risk condition). Across the full dataset and a reduced dataset in which participants were not accidentally interrupted during the task (n = 48), children in the promise condition waited longer to eat their treat than children in the social risk condition. Younger children, but not older children, also successfully delayed gratification more often in the promise condition than in the social risk condition. Thus, even when communication is one-sided in an interdependent marshmallow task, explicit promises can support children’s motivation to delay gratification relative to explicit uncertainty. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e3bf960f8cd14496b7fcd9decb2ee8d9 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2054-5703 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | The Royal Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Royal Society Open Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-e3bf960f8cd14496b7fcd9decb2ee8d92025-08-20T02:57:52ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032025-05-0112510.1098/rsos.250392Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts?Rebecca Koomen0Owen Waddington1Leonor Santana Miranda Goncalves2Bahar Köymen3Keith Jensen4School of Collective Intelligence, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, MoroccoDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKFor cooperation to succeed, individuals must often ‘delay gratification’ and forego an immediate reward for a larger delayed reward that is co-produced through the cooperative act. This experiment asked whether a promise to wait increased children’s propensity to coordinate with their partner by waiting to eat their own treat. In this first cooperative marshmallow test conducted online, 5- to 6-year-old UK-based children (n = 66) interacted from their homes via video call with a confederate child who either promised not to eat his treat (promise condition) or expressed the possibility that he might eat his treat (social risk condition). Across the full dataset and a reduced dataset in which participants were not accidentally interrupted during the task (n = 48), children in the promise condition waited longer to eat their treat than children in the social risk condition. Younger children, but not older children, also successfully delayed gratification more often in the promise condition than in the social risk condition. Thus, even when communication is one-sided in an interdependent marshmallow task, explicit promises can support children’s motivation to delay gratification relative to explicit uncertainty.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.250392delay of gratificationcooperationmarshmallow paradigmpromises |
| spellingShingle | Rebecca Koomen Owen Waddington Leonor Santana Miranda Goncalves Bahar Köymen Keith Jensen Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts? Royal Society Open Science delay of gratification cooperation marshmallow paradigm promises |
| title | Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts? |
| title_full | Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts? |
| title_fullStr | Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts? |
| title_short | Does promising facilitate children’s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts? |
| title_sort | does promising facilitate children s delay of gratification in interdependent contexts |
| topic | delay of gratification cooperation marshmallow paradigm promises |
| url | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.250392 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rebeccakoomen doespromisingfacilitatechildrensdelayofgratificationininterdependentcontexts AT owenwaddington doespromisingfacilitatechildrensdelayofgratificationininterdependentcontexts AT leonorsantanamirandagoncalves doespromisingfacilitatechildrensdelayofgratificationininterdependentcontexts AT baharkoymen doespromisingfacilitatechildrensdelayofgratificationininterdependentcontexts AT keithjensen doespromisingfacilitatechildrensdelayofgratificationininterdependentcontexts |