Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial

Objective Patients with uncontrolled gout have few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) levels, but antidrug antibodies limit SU‐lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) cotherapy increases pegloticase response rates and lowers IR risk in peglo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Orrin M. Troum, John K. Botson, Katie Obermeyer, Bo Chao, Yang Song, Jennifer Zarzoso, Kjerstina Gutierrez, Supra Verma, Lissa Padnick‐Silver, Brian LaMoreaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:ACR Open Rheumatology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11789
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542411138531328
author Orrin M. Troum
John K. Botson
Katie Obermeyer
Bo Chao
Yang Song
Jennifer Zarzoso
Kjerstina Gutierrez
Supra Verma
Lissa Padnick‐Silver
Brian LaMoreaux
author_facet Orrin M. Troum
John K. Botson
Katie Obermeyer
Bo Chao
Yang Song
Jennifer Zarzoso
Kjerstina Gutierrez
Supra Verma
Lissa Padnick‐Silver
Brian LaMoreaux
author_sort Orrin M. Troum
collection DOAJ
description Objective Patients with uncontrolled gout have few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) levels, but antidrug antibodies limit SU‐lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) cotherapy increases pegloticase response rates and lowers IR risk in pegloticase‐naïve patients. Therefore, the question of re‐treating patients with previous pegloticase monotherapy failure has arisen. The ADVANCE open‐label trial examined pegloticase plus MTX cotherapy efficacy and safety following pegloticase monotherapy failure. Methods Patients with uncontrolled gout (SU levels ≥6 mg/dL, oral urate–lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and ≥1 gout sign or symptom) who previously lost SU‐lowering response to pegloticase monotherapy were included. Key exclusion criteria were moderate‐to‐severe IR or anaphylaxis to pegloticase, MTX contraindication, immunosuppressant administration, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2. After a 6‐week subcutaneous MTX run‐in (at 25 mg/wk), patients entered 24‐week pegloticase (at 8 mg biweekly) plus MTX treatment. The primary end point was SU‐lowering response rate during month 6 (SU levels <6 mg/dL for ≥80% of weeks 20–24). Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory monitoring. Results Eleven patients began pegloticase plus MTX treatment (91% male patients, mean age 58.6 ± 11.3 years, mean ± SD SU levels 8.5 ± 3.2 mg/dL, 91% tophaceous). Previous pegloticase course was 2 to 27 infusions, with the last infusion admins being a mean ± SD of 3.7 ± 2.4 years before. One patient (9%) maintained response during month 6; 10 patients prematurely discontinued treatment (loss of SU lowering [n = 8], IR [n = 2]). Eight patients (73%) experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly gout flare. All AEs were mild or moderate. Conclusion Pegloticase plus MTX response rate following failed monotherapy was lower (9% vs 71%) and IR rate was higher (18% vs 4%) than in pegloticase‐naïve patients. These findings demonstrate the challenge of overcoming established antipegloticase antibodies and emphasize the importance of initiating immunomodulation before the first pegloticase exposure.
format Article
id doaj-art-e3a53429909e41588d5f6717fcf4def1
institution Kabale University
issn 2578-5745
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ACR Open Rheumatology
spelling doaj-art-e3a53429909e41588d5f6717fcf4def12025-02-04T06:21:23ZengWileyACR Open Rheumatology2578-57452025-01-0171n/an/a10.1002/acr2.11789Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label TrialOrrin M. Troum0John K. Botson1Katie Obermeyer2Bo Chao3Yang Song4Jennifer Zarzoso5Kjerstina Gutierrez6Supra Verma7Lissa Padnick‐Silver8Brian LaMoreaux9University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, and Providence Saint John's Health Center Santa MonicaOrthopedic Physicians Alaska AnchorageAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisAmgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc) Deerfield IllinoisObjective Patients with uncontrolled gout have few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) levels, but antidrug antibodies limit SU‐lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) cotherapy increases pegloticase response rates and lowers IR risk in pegloticase‐naïve patients. Therefore, the question of re‐treating patients with previous pegloticase monotherapy failure has arisen. The ADVANCE open‐label trial examined pegloticase plus MTX cotherapy efficacy and safety following pegloticase monotherapy failure. Methods Patients with uncontrolled gout (SU levels ≥6 mg/dL, oral urate–lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and ≥1 gout sign or symptom) who previously lost SU‐lowering response to pegloticase monotherapy were included. Key exclusion criteria were moderate‐to‐severe IR or anaphylaxis to pegloticase, MTX contraindication, immunosuppressant administration, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2. After a 6‐week subcutaneous MTX run‐in (at 25 mg/wk), patients entered 24‐week pegloticase (at 8 mg biweekly) plus MTX treatment. The primary end point was SU‐lowering response rate during month 6 (SU levels <6 mg/dL for ≥80% of weeks 20–24). Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory monitoring. Results Eleven patients began pegloticase plus MTX treatment (91% male patients, mean age 58.6 ± 11.3 years, mean ± SD SU levels 8.5 ± 3.2 mg/dL, 91% tophaceous). Previous pegloticase course was 2 to 27 infusions, with the last infusion admins being a mean ± SD of 3.7 ± 2.4 years before. One patient (9%) maintained response during month 6; 10 patients prematurely discontinued treatment (loss of SU lowering [n = 8], IR [n = 2]). Eight patients (73%) experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly gout flare. All AEs were mild or moderate. Conclusion Pegloticase plus MTX response rate following failed monotherapy was lower (9% vs 71%) and IR rate was higher (18% vs 4%) than in pegloticase‐naïve patients. These findings demonstrate the challenge of overcoming established antipegloticase antibodies and emphasize the importance of initiating immunomodulation before the first pegloticase exposure.https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11789
spellingShingle Orrin M. Troum
John K. Botson
Katie Obermeyer
Bo Chao
Yang Song
Jennifer Zarzoso
Kjerstina Gutierrez
Supra Verma
Lissa Padnick‐Silver
Brian LaMoreaux
Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial
ACR Open Rheumatology
title Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial
title_full Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial
title_fullStr Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial
title_full_unstemmed Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial
title_short Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure: Findings of an Open‐Label Trial
title_sort pegloticase and methotrexate cotherapy in patients with uncontrolled gout with prior pegloticase monotherapy failure findings of an open label trial
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11789
work_keys_str_mv AT orrinmtroum pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT johnkbotson pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT katieobermeyer pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT bochao pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT yangsong pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT jenniferzarzoso pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT kjerstinagutierrez pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT supraverma pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT lissapadnicksilver pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial
AT brianlamoreaux pegloticaseandmethotrexatecotherapyinpatientswithuncontrolledgoutwithpriorpegloticasemonotherapyfailurefindingsofanopenlabeltrial