A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) has grown in recent years to supplement or even replace traditional fabrication methods. Specifically, the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process has been used to manufacture components in support of sustainment issues, where obsolete components are hard to procure....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanuel De Leon, Alex Riensche, Benjamin D. Bevans, Christopher Billings, Zahed Siddique, Yingtao Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/1/22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588312534056960
author Emmanuel De Leon
Alex Riensche
Benjamin D. Bevans
Christopher Billings
Zahed Siddique
Yingtao Liu
author_facet Emmanuel De Leon
Alex Riensche
Benjamin D. Bevans
Christopher Billings
Zahed Siddique
Yingtao Liu
author_sort Emmanuel De Leon
collection DOAJ
description Metal additive manufacturing (AM) has grown in recent years to supplement or even replace traditional fabrication methods. Specifically, the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process has been used to manufacture components in support of sustainment issues, where obsolete components are hard to procure. While LPBF can be used to solve these issues, much work is still required to fully understand the metal AM technology to determine its usefulness as a reliable manufacturing process. Due to the complex physical mechanisms involved in the multiscale problem of LPBF, repeatability is often difficult to achieve and consequently makes meeting qualification requirements challenging. The purpose of this work is to provide a review of the physics of metal AM at the melt pool and part scales, thermomechanical simulation methods, as well as the available commercial software used for finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics modeling. In addition, metal AM process qualification frameworks are briefly discussed in the context of the computational basis established in this work.
format Article
id doaj-art-e38ea12bd69c4ed0afbcf92e2a7416f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2504-4494
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
spelling doaj-art-e38ea12bd69c4ed0afbcf92e2a7416f62025-01-24T13:36:28ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942025-01-01912210.3390/jmmp9010022A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion MethodEmmanuel De Leon0Alex Riensche1Benjamin D. Bevans2Christopher Billings3Zahed Siddique4Yingtao Liu5Sooner Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USASooner Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USASooner Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USASooner Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USASooner Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USASooner Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USAMetal additive manufacturing (AM) has grown in recent years to supplement or even replace traditional fabrication methods. Specifically, the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process has been used to manufacture components in support of sustainment issues, where obsolete components are hard to procure. While LPBF can be used to solve these issues, much work is still required to fully understand the metal AM technology to determine its usefulness as a reliable manufacturing process. Due to the complex physical mechanisms involved in the multiscale problem of LPBF, repeatability is often difficult to achieve and consequently makes meeting qualification requirements challenging. The purpose of this work is to provide a review of the physics of metal AM at the melt pool and part scales, thermomechanical simulation methods, as well as the available commercial software used for finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics modeling. In addition, metal AM process qualification frameworks are briefly discussed in the context of the computational basis established in this work.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/1/22metal additive manufacturingmultiscale physicsprocess simulationmultiscale simulationprocess qualificationlaser powder bed fusion
spellingShingle Emmanuel De Leon
Alex Riensche
Benjamin D. Bevans
Christopher Billings
Zahed Siddique
Yingtao Liu
A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
metal additive manufacturing
multiscale physics
process simulation
multiscale simulation
process qualification
laser powder bed fusion
title A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method
title_full A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method
title_fullStr A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method
title_short A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method
title_sort review of modeling simulation and process qualification of additively manufactured metal components via the laser powder bed fusion method
topic metal additive manufacturing
multiscale physics
process simulation
multiscale simulation
process qualification
laser powder bed fusion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanueldeleon areviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT alexriensche areviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT benjamindbevans areviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT christopherbillings areviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT zahedsiddique areviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT yingtaoliu areviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT emmanueldeleon reviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT alexriensche reviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT benjamindbevans reviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT christopherbillings reviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT zahedsiddique reviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod
AT yingtaoliu reviewofmodelingsimulationandprocessqualificationofadditivelymanufacturedmetalcomponentsviathelaserpowderbedfusionmethod