Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis

Objective: to evaluate the efficiency of basic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) depending on the time of its start and the choice of a starting regimen. Subjects and methods. The study included 258 patients with verified RA, who were divided into groups by the time of basic therapy initiation....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Irina Mikhailovna Marusenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: IMA-PRESS LLC 2010-12-01
Series:Современная ревматология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/318
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849690427675901952
author Irina Mikhailovna Marusenko
author_facet Irina Mikhailovna Marusenko
author_sort Irina Mikhailovna Marusenko
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to evaluate the efficiency of basic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) depending on the time of its start and the choice of a starting regimen. Subjects and methods. The study included 258 patients with verified RA, who were divided into groups by the time of basic therapy initiation. All the patients were estimated for changes in the articular syndrome (Ritchie articular index, the number of painful joints, that of inflamed joints, pain and total disease activity assessment by the visual analogue scale, morning stiffness in minutes, and the number of erosions by hand and foot X-ray films). Therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated by the EULAR criteria on the basis of DAS 4 changes and the number of erosions. Results. The study group showed significant clinical and laboratory improvements at the early start of basic therapy as compared with the controls. Assessment using the EURLAR criteria indicated better short-term results in leflunomide-treated patients; overall, a greater percentage of improvements were noted in the study group than in the control one. The study group exhibited a total significantly less increase in the number of erosions as did subgroups with different basic therapy options, but not the sulfasalazine subgroup. Conclusion. Basic therapy initiated at the time of diagnosis of RA permits disease activity and progression to be more effectively controlled than delayed therapy
format Article
id doaj-art-e383388a2815434cb8cd2661ba5d4934
institution DOAJ
issn 1996-7012
2310-158X
language Russian
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher IMA-PRESS LLC
record_format Article
series Современная ревматология
spelling doaj-art-e383388a2815434cb8cd2661ba5d49342025-08-20T03:21:18ZrusIMA-PRESS LLCСовременная ревматология1996-70122310-158X2010-12-0144323910.14412/1996-7012-2010-6331623Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritisIrina Mikhailovna MarusenkoObjective: to evaluate the efficiency of basic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) depending on the time of its start and the choice of a starting regimen. Subjects and methods. The study included 258 patients with verified RA, who were divided into groups by the time of basic therapy initiation. All the patients were estimated for changes in the articular syndrome (Ritchie articular index, the number of painful joints, that of inflamed joints, pain and total disease activity assessment by the visual analogue scale, morning stiffness in minutes, and the number of erosions by hand and foot X-ray films). Therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated by the EULAR criteria on the basis of DAS 4 changes and the number of erosions. Results. The study group showed significant clinical and laboratory improvements at the early start of basic therapy as compared with the controls. Assessment using the EURLAR criteria indicated better short-term results in leflunomide-treated patients; overall, a greater percentage of improvements were noted in the study group than in the control one. The study group exhibited a total significantly less increase in the number of erosions as did subgroups with different basic therapy options, but not the sulfasalazine subgroup. Conclusion. Basic therapy initiated at the time of diagnosis of RA permits disease activity and progression to be more effectively controlled than delayed therapyhttps://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/318rheumatoid arthritisbasic anti-inflammatory drugs
spellingShingle Irina Mikhailovna Marusenko
Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
Современная ревматология
rheumatoid arthritis
basic anti-inflammatory drugs
title Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti-inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of standard basic anti inflammatory drugs and the time to start basictherapy for rheumatoid arthritis
topic rheumatoid arthritis
basic anti-inflammatory drugs
url https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/318
work_keys_str_mv AT irinamikhailovnamarusenko evaluationoftheefficacyofstandardbasicantiinflammatorydrugsandthetimetostartbasictherapyforrheumatoidarthritis