Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl

Urban growth agreements are key tools for achieving the goal of zero growth in passenger road traffic volumes in Norwegian metropolitan areas. Agreements are negotiated in multi-level and cross-sectoral processes where local politicians meet strong expectations and incentives to alter their land use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aud Tennøy, Gro Sandkjær Hanssen, Einar Leknes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/333
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850080636120858624
author Aud Tennøy
Gro Sandkjær Hanssen
Einar Leknes
author_facet Aud Tennøy
Gro Sandkjær Hanssen
Einar Leknes
author_sort Aud Tennøy
collection DOAJ
description Urban growth agreements are key tools for achieving the goal of zero growth in passenger road traffic volumes in Norwegian metropolitan areas. Agreements are negotiated in multi-level and cross-sectoral processes where local politicians meet strong expectations and incentives to alter their land use policies and stop sprawl. This paper analyses the effectiveness of the policy instrument in influencing local land use policy, whereby key issues were raised in the negotiations concerning land use, local politicians’ reflections on changing their policies and why they were reluctant to stop sprawl. This research was designed as a comparative case study with three negotiation processes as cases. Data were collected through document studies and interviews with 36 professionals and politicians. Key issues in the negotiations over land use regarded principles of authority in land use planning and decision-making and substantial disagreements concerning land use policies. Local politicians saw sprawl as necessary for attaining local objectives. Conflicting framings of the policy issue, namely ‘stopping sprawl to achieve zero traffic growth’ and ‘continuing sprawl to attain local objectives’, explained the policy controversy that made discourse difficult. The resulting agreements did not directly influence local land use policies but might have an effect in the longer term.
format Article
id doaj-art-e35cccbba2834db2a4e9c546910cd24b
institution DOAJ
issn 2073-445X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj-art-e35cccbba2834db2a4e9c546910cd24b2025-08-20T02:44:53ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2025-02-0114233310.3390/land14020333Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop SprawlAud Tennøy0Gro Sandkjær Hanssen1Einar Leknes2Institute of Transport Economics, Norwegian Centre for Transport Research, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4 St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayNORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Postboks 22 Nygårdstangen, 5838 Bergen, NorwayUrban growth agreements are key tools for achieving the goal of zero growth in passenger road traffic volumes in Norwegian metropolitan areas. Agreements are negotiated in multi-level and cross-sectoral processes where local politicians meet strong expectations and incentives to alter their land use policies and stop sprawl. This paper analyses the effectiveness of the policy instrument in influencing local land use policy, whereby key issues were raised in the negotiations concerning land use, local politicians’ reflections on changing their policies and why they were reluctant to stop sprawl. This research was designed as a comparative case study with three negotiation processes as cases. Data were collected through document studies and interviews with 36 professionals and politicians. Key issues in the negotiations over land use regarded principles of authority in land use planning and decision-making and substantial disagreements concerning land use policies. Local politicians saw sprawl as necessary for attaining local objectives. Conflicting framings of the policy issue, namely ‘stopping sprawl to achieve zero traffic growth’ and ‘continuing sprawl to attain local objectives’, explained the policy controversy that made discourse difficult. The resulting agreements did not directly influence local land use policies but might have an effect in the longer term.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/333sustainable land use policylocal politiciansmunicipal self-governancesprawlurban growth agreementsland use negotiations
spellingShingle Aud Tennøy
Gro Sandkjær Hanssen
Einar Leknes
Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl
Land
sustainable land use policy
local politicians
municipal self-governance
sprawl
urban growth agreements
land use negotiations
title Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl
title_full Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl
title_fullStr Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl
title_short Experiences of Using Urban Growth Agreements to Influence Local Land Use Policy and Stop Sprawl
title_sort experiences of using urban growth agreements to influence local land use policy and stop sprawl
topic sustainable land use policy
local politicians
municipal self-governance
sprawl
urban growth agreements
land use negotiations
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/333
work_keys_str_mv AT audtennøy experiencesofusingurbangrowthagreementstoinfluencelocallandusepolicyandstopsprawl
AT grosandkjærhanssen experiencesofusingurbangrowthagreementstoinfluencelocallandusepolicyandstopsprawl
AT einarleknes experiencesofusingurbangrowthagreementstoinfluencelocallandusepolicyandstopsprawl